Sampling Methods and Number of Roundwoods for Determining the Moisture Content

Abstract

This study had the objective of comparing two methodologies of sampling, Simple Random Sampling (ACS) and Stratified Random Sampling (ACE) to determine the optimum number of roundwood samples to obtain the moisture content of the population. In order to achieve this goal, different percentages of allowable error (5,10,15 and 20%) were considered for each sampling methodology. In the conduction of this study, the samples were randomly taken from a lot of 250 steres of wood, 144 roundwood of three meters of length and distributed in four classes of diameter. Later, the moisture content of these samples was determined. And, from these values, the population estimates (average, standard deviation, variance, coefficient of variation, and standard error) by ACS and ACE methods, helped to determine the optimum number of roundwood (n) to be sampled from different percentages of allowable error adopted in this study at 95% probability. According to the results, the amount of roundwood to be sampled from ACS for each allowable error 5, 10, 15 and 20% was respectively 214, 55, 25 and 14. For the ACE (proportional allocation) the amount of roundwood was 141, 35, 16 and 9 for ACE (optimal allocation) this number was 136, 34, 15 and 8. It was concluded that the most indicated sampling method for this study, considering the allowable error, was the ACE method.

Valoração econômica de bens e serviços ecossistêmicos no Parque Nacional da Serra da Capivara: uma abordagem baseada no Método do Custo de Viagem

“…O nível de renda mensal dos turistas apontou que 50,6% possui recebimentos maiores que cinco salários mínimos e 21% recebe de um a três salários mínimos mensalmente, reforçando a hipótese de que o custo de viagem influencia na demanda de visitantes, prevalecendo o perfil socioeconômico pertencente a faixas de renda mais altas. É válido recordar que, no período em que as entrevistas foram aplicadas, o valor do salário mínimo brasileiro era de R$ 998,00 (BACEN, 2019). As classificações sociodemográficas utilizadas foram baseadas nos indicadores sociais do IBGE (2019).…”

“…Dessa forma, obtém-se um tamanho de amostra ótimo de 77 respondentes sendo que foram considerados válidos 81 questionários. É interessante mencionar que o erro do 10% pode se justificar por razões de tempo, disponibilidade de recursos, logística, deslocamento até o local, tal como emBarros et al, (2018), Tyskowski et al, (2018) e Lima et al, (2019).…”