2020
DOI: 10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Validation of the Six Housekeeping Genes for Normalizing Mrna Expression in the Ovarian Follicles and Several Tissues in Chicken

Abstract: Expression of housekeeping genes is relatively constant in different tissues and cells by RT-qPCR analysis. Housekeeping genes (HGs) are usually utilized as the reference to evaluate and compare mRNA expression abundances of target genes in different cells or tissues sampled. However, the expression stabilities of different HGs in diverse samples may appear divergence. Currently, there is no exact reference data of HGs in hen ovarian follicular tissues during egg-laying period available yet. In this study, we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative mRNA expression levels for the target genes were quantified with a StepOnePlusTM Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) as described by Mavrommatis et al [ 35 ]. GAPDH and ACTB were used as housekeeping genes to normalize the cDNA template concentrations [ 36 ]. The relative expression levels of the target genes were performed as described by Mavrommatis et al [ 35 ], while the primers’ efficiency was calculated by employing the linear regression method on the log (fluorescence) per cycle number (ΔRn) using the LinRegPCR software [ 37 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative mRNA expression levels for the target genes were quantified with a StepOnePlusTM Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) as described by Mavrommatis et al [ 35 ]. GAPDH and ACTB were used as housekeeping genes to normalize the cDNA template concentrations [ 36 ]. The relative expression levels of the target genes were performed as described by Mavrommatis et al [ 35 ], while the primers’ efficiency was calculated by employing the linear regression method on the log (fluorescence) per cycle number (ΔRn) using the LinRegPCR software [ 37 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR program initiated at 95 °C for 8 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for one min. The geometrical mean of GAPDH and ACTB were used to normalize the cDNA template concentrations as has been previously indicated [ 20 ]. The relative expression levels of the target genes were performed as described by Mavrommatis et al [ 21 ], while PCR efficiency was determined by employing the linear regression method on the log (fluorescence) per cycle number (ΔRn) using the LinRegPCR software applying the default settings [ 22 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primer sequences were derived from the literature data, our previous published scientific reports or designed based on a cDNA nucleotide sequence using NCBI Primer Blast [ 22 ]. The selection of the reference genes was based on the literature [ 23 , 24 ] and our previous molecular analyzes [ 21 ]. Analysis included the geometric mean of two independent reference genes ( ACTB and G6PDH ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%