2017
DOI: 10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Live Performance, Carcass, and Bone Quality Responses of Grower and Finisher Broilers to Dietary Metabolizable Energy Levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…total and digestible amino acids in broilers was studied, and Ghaffari et al (2007) found significant differences in feed conversion, with a decrease in the conversion value from 2.43 to 1.79. The results of the present study are consistent with those of Gopinger et al (2017), that found a linear effect on feed:gain ratio, with the better feed conversion (1,64) obtained with the higher energetic value (3250 kcacl/kg was 9630 kcal, and the highest intake was 10020 kcal, with an estimated value of 2966.75 kcal/ kg of diet, according to the quadratic model. These variations in energy intake differ from those found by Barbosa et al (2008), who did not find significant differences in ME intake during any of the phases tested (22 to 35, 36 to 42 and 43 to 49 days old) in confined broilers.…”
Section: Experiments 2 -Metabolizable Energy In Fastgrowing Broilers Isupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…total and digestible amino acids in broilers was studied, and Ghaffari et al (2007) found significant differences in feed conversion, with a decrease in the conversion value from 2.43 to 1.79. The results of the present study are consistent with those of Gopinger et al (2017), that found a linear effect on feed:gain ratio, with the better feed conversion (1,64) obtained with the higher energetic value (3250 kcacl/kg was 9630 kcal, and the highest intake was 10020 kcal, with an estimated value of 2966.75 kcal/ kg of diet, according to the quadratic model. These variations in energy intake differ from those found by Barbosa et al (2008), who did not find significant differences in ME intake during any of the phases tested (22 to 35, 36 to 42 and 43 to 49 days old) in confined broilers.…”
Section: Experiments 2 -Metabolizable Energy In Fastgrowing Broilers Isupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The lack of significant effects on weight gain can be explained in part by the ability of the birds to adjust their consumption to meet their energy needs (Gopinger et al, 2017). The results observed in the present research agree with those of Ávila et al (2005), who evaluated different metabolizable energy levels for fastgrowing broiler breeders with access to picket and did not observe effects on the weight gain from 28 to 41 days old.…”
Section: Experiments 2 -Metabolizable Energy In Fastgrowing Broilers Isupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the carcass yield of the birds at the end of the growing cycle, Gopinger et al (2017), when evaluating variation in the energy level (variation ± 200 Kcal kg -1 of metabolisable energy), also did not observe an effect of the energy level on the weight of the carcass or the cuts of the chickens at the end of the production cycle of the birds.…”
Section: Concomitantmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…According to Dessimoni et al (2019), birds tend to increase their FI in an attempt to compensate for the nutrient deficit. As stated by Gopinger, Krabbe, Surek, Lopes and Avila (2017), FI in broilers is increased with a reduction in the dietary DM. The reduction in energy and amino acid levels in the present study was possibly not severe enough to prompt an adjustment in FI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%