2019
DOI: 10.1590/1679-78255342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling of An Impacted Reticulated Dome Using Partial Similitude Method

Abstract: Strain-rate effects can distort model testing with geometrically-similar models. In impact modelling this problem is usually addressed by revising the impact conditions, but such kind of method is inadequate for modelling impact on a reticulated dome. A new technique was proposed and tested. Apart from adjusting the impact conditions, the technique adds additional mass to components of the model to balance the strain-rate effects. That allows studying in model scale more complex structures in which the strain … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Poisson's ratio μ of the soil in the test is 0.35, the coefficient K � μ/(1 − μ) of the lateral pressure is 0.54, and the dimensionless index n � 2. Other similarity coefficients [29] based on the similarity principle are shown in Table 9.…”
Section: Comparison Of Our Prediction Model Results With Shakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poisson's ratio μ of the soil in the test is 0.35, the coefficient K � μ/(1 − μ) of the lateral pressure is 0.54, and the dimensionless index n � 2. Other similarity coefficients [29] based on the similarity principle are shown in Table 9.…”
Section: Comparison Of Our Prediction Model Results With Shakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dimension of the shaking table is 1.5m×1.5m, and the dimension of the model box is 0.5m (wide) ×2m (length) ×1.5m (height), and the test model is shown in Figure 17. The geometric similarity coefficient (Wei, Hu, 2019) is set as 1:50, and other specific similarity coefficients are shown in Table 4. 20mm thick sponge was laid on the inner wall of the model box to reduce reflection of seismic waves on the boundary.…”
Section: Shaking Table Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size effects of material strain-rate sensitivity were widespread [9], prompting researchers to develop the non-geometric scaling method with correction factors of external loads [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Oshiro and Alves [11] for example used a basic correction factor of impact velocity to compensate distortion of material strain rate effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simple analytical models [11] and complex numerical models [12], with the strain-rate sensitive mild steel, only had very small prediction errors. Similarly, the basic correction factor of mass/density for the impactor and structure were also developed in early work [13] and in recent work [14,15]. However, these developed methods were limited by an inherent defect that the basic correction factors were coupled to the structural average strain-rate responses and therefore were called to be indirect, which was hard to understand in similarity theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%