2018
DOI: 10.1590/1679-78254432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the creep behavior of GRFP truss structures with Positional Finite Element Method

Abstract: This paper presents the development of a formulation, based on Positional Finite Element Method, to describe the viscoelastic mechanical behavior of space trusses. The numerical method used was chosen due to its efficiency in the applications concerning nonlinear numerical analyses. The formulation describes the positional variation over time under constant stress state (creep). The objective is to provide a way to quantify the creep behavior for space truss structures and thus contribute to the encouragement … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different numerical formulations have been developed to analyze the viscoelastic behavior of solid materials, as demonstrated in the works of Chen [1], Aköz and Kadioǧlu [2], Beijer and Spoormaker [3], Zheng et al [4], Mesquita and Coda [5], Galucio et al [6], Bottoni et al [7], Payette and Reddy [8], Panagiotopoulos et al [9], Latorre and Montáns [10], dos Santos Becho et al [11], Carniel et al [12], Oliveira and Leonel [13], Pascon and Coda [14], Rabelo et al [15], and Fernandes et al [16]. is interest is due to the need for modeling behavior of unconventional materials and the more complex and realistic analyzes of structures and structural components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different numerical formulations have been developed to analyze the viscoelastic behavior of solid materials, as demonstrated in the works of Chen [1], Aköz and Kadioǧlu [2], Beijer and Spoormaker [3], Zheng et al [4], Mesquita and Coda [5], Galucio et al [6], Bottoni et al [7], Payette and Reddy [8], Panagiotopoulos et al [9], Latorre and Montáns [10], dos Santos Becho et al [11], Carniel et al [12], Oliveira and Leonel [13], Pascon and Coda [14], Rabelo et al [15], and Fernandes et al [16]. is interest is due to the need for modeling behavior of unconventional materials and the more complex and realistic analyzes of structures and structural components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…us, structural engineering aims to address the demands for technological advances in the most diverse areas, such as infrastructure, civil construction, mechanical industry, aerospace industry, and others. Part of these studies are related to the analyses of structures with viscoelastic behavior adopting stress-strain relation deduced from rheological models, as demonstrated in the works of Aköz and Kadioǧlu [2], Mesquita and Coda [5], Panagiotopoulos et al [9], dos Santos Becho et al [11], Carniel et al [12], Oliveira and Leonel [13], Pascon and Coda [14], Rabelo et al [15], and Fernandes et al [16]. ese rheological models are schematic representations that combine elastic and viscous elements to obtain a physical interpretation of stress-strain relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The strain energy function of the considered body (framed elements) is considered to be stored at the reference volume of the body (V) and E represents the material longitudinal elasticity modulus. An engineering strain measure ( ) can be used to calculate the strain energy, as presented in Rabelo et al [21]. The damping contribution (Ka) in the energy functional (Π) is implicit.…”
Section: Finite Element Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the high speed of 5.0 mm s −1 , the average force and work done were both significantly higher in trials that left residue. Fracture can occur in viscoelastic materials at both high and low stresses if the stress is applied over enough time [25]. Therefore, the force to remove the pellets at the low speed of 0.76 mm s −1 may not depend on whether or not residue was left because the time elapsed was sufficient to fracture the pellet.…”
Section: Force To Remove a Pelletmentioning
confidence: 99%