2015
DOI: 10.1590/1679-78251142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Fracture in an Interface Crack Between Bone Cement and Stainless Steel

Abstract: Interface strength is considered as one of the most influential factors in the long-term durability of the replaced joint in cemented total hip replacement. Several researchers have suggested that the damage initiation in a replaced joint is a mechanical phenomenon primarily taking place in the vicinity of cement-prosthesis interface. In this study, the fracture behavior of a crack at the interface of cement-prosthesis was investigated both experimentally and theoretically under static loading conditions. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore necessary to develop other test methods to evaluate the interlaminar fracture parameters of materials under all in-plane loading conditions starting from pure mode-I to pure mode-II. In recent years, many researchers have been used different loading devices for evaluation of the fracture toughness of materials like Ban et al (2015), Choupani et al (2015), Nunes and Reis (2014), Silva et al (2016). A modified version of Arcan specimen has been made for the mixedmode fracture test of adhesively bonded joints, which allows pure mode-I, pure mode-II, and almost any combination of mode-I and mode-II loading to be tested using the same test specimen configuration by Arcan et al (1978) and several studies have been done using Arcan specimen like Ayatollahi and Sedighiani (2012), Cognard et al (2008), Nikbakht and Choupani (2009), Heydari et al (2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore necessary to develop other test methods to evaluate the interlaminar fracture parameters of materials under all in-plane loading conditions starting from pure mode-I to pure mode-II. In recent years, many researchers have been used different loading devices for evaluation of the fracture toughness of materials like Ban et al (2015), Choupani et al (2015), Nunes and Reis (2014), Silva et al (2016). A modified version of Arcan specimen has been made for the mixedmode fracture test of adhesively bonded joints, which allows pure mode-I, pure mode-II, and almost any combination of mode-I and mode-II loading to be tested using the same test specimen configuration by Arcan et al (1978) and several studies have been done using Arcan specimen like Ayatollahi and Sedighiani (2012), Cognard et al (2008), Nikbakht and Choupani (2009), Heydari et al (2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These publications were critically examined, but did not reveal any references to the aspects emphasised here. It is also worth mentioning the contributions of Lanaro et al (2009), Andreev (1991, Markides et al (2012), Erarslan et al (2012) and Aydin and Basu (2006), Yang et al (2015), Haeri et al (2014), Choupania et al (2015), Cai et al (2015), which addressed the issue of the Brazilian test, either theoretically or experimentally, or even applied. However, none of them investigated the foundations raised from Timoshenko and Goodier (1970), in which the problem of methodological character examined in this work was found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%