2019
DOI: 10.1590/1678-992x-2017-0191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risks associated with a double-cropping production system - a case study in southern Brazil

Abstract: This study assessed the risk exposure of the production system of a typical farm in southern Brazil. Five possible production systems were analyzed, combining three crops (soybeans, corn seasons and wheat) in different crop-year combinations, for example: "Summer soybeans followed by corn" and "Autumn corn followed by winter wheat". Five different production systems were created based on the intensity of land use for each of the crops. Primary data were collected from a typical farm in the producing region ove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
2
8
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This strong selection pressure is reinforced by the intensive double‐cropping systems practised in tropical and subtropical Brazilian agroecosystems, which include rotations among wheat, maize and/or soybean. In these cropping systems, wheat is directly sprayed with QoI, DMI, and SDHI fungicides to target aerial pathogens such as PoTl during the typical autumn‐winter cropping season, while other Poaceae hosts that typically invade maize or soybean fields are indirectly sprayed with the same fungicides that are applied to the alternating crop in the subsequent spring‐summer cropping season (Osaki et al, 2019). An alternative hypothesis is that no fitness costs are associated with QoI and azole resistance, resulting in the persistence of resistant genotypes even in the absence of selection pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strong selection pressure is reinforced by the intensive double‐cropping systems practised in tropical and subtropical Brazilian agroecosystems, which include rotations among wheat, maize and/or soybean. In these cropping systems, wheat is directly sprayed with QoI, DMI, and SDHI fungicides to target aerial pathogens such as PoTl during the typical autumn‐winter cropping season, while other Poaceae hosts that typically invade maize or soybean fields are indirectly sprayed with the same fungicides that are applied to the alternating crop in the subsequent spring‐summer cropping season (Osaki et al, 2019). An alternative hypothesis is that no fitness costs are associated with QoI and azole resistance, resulting in the persistence of resistant genotypes even in the absence of selection pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para Osaki et al (2019), existem duas limitações signifi -ca� vas atreladas ao método de Monte Carlo que devem ser consideradas ao aplicá-lo em um estudo. O primeiro deles seria a difi culdade em determinar, algebricamente, a distribuição de probabilidade das variáveis analisadas, quando não há conhecimento prévio sufi ciente sobre a base de dados.…”
Section: Simulação De Monte Carlounclassified
“…Outros componentes captados envolvem forma de financiamento da produção, seguro agrícola, forma de comercialização, dentre outros custos diversos. Procedimento similar pode ser encontrado em Osaki et al (2019).…”
Section: Evolução Histórica Da áRea Semeada Com Soja Milho E Trigo No Sul Do Brasilunclassified