2015
DOI: 10.1590/1678-7795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous and long term measurement of reticuloruminal pH in crossbreed dairy cows in Brazil by an indwelling and wireless data transmitting unit

Abstract: Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A test performed in Brazil to evaluate the ruminal temperature device employed in the study, for Holstein Friesian dairy cows producing from 30 to 48 L day -1 of milk, obtained ruminal temperatures between 38.8-39.1°C and drinking events from 6.4-9.5 times per day. The cow that displayed more drinking events was not healthy and exhibited left displacement of the abomasum (GASTEINER et al, 2015). In the present assessment, the frequency of drinking events was lower (3 and 3.3 times day -1 ) when compared with the results reported by Gasteiner et al (2015).…”
Section: Controlcontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A test performed in Brazil to evaluate the ruminal temperature device employed in the study, for Holstein Friesian dairy cows producing from 30 to 48 L day -1 of milk, obtained ruminal temperatures between 38.8-39.1°C and drinking events from 6.4-9.5 times per day. The cow that displayed more drinking events was not healthy and exhibited left displacement of the abomasum (GASTEINER et al, 2015). In the present assessment, the frequency of drinking events was lower (3 and 3.3 times day -1 ) when compared with the results reported by Gasteiner et al (2015).…”
Section: Controlcontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…The cow that displayed more drinking events was not healthy and exhibited left displacement of the abomasum (GASTEINER et al, 2015). In the present assessment, the frequency of drinking events was lower (3 and 3.3 times day -1 ) when compared with the results reported by Gasteiner et al (2015).…”
Section: Controlcontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…The ruminal pH pattern of a cow fed in the classic system (twice a day) shows a two-phase curve with a pH decrease after feeding. The pH reaches its lowest value 2 to 4 h after feeding and increases continuously until the next feeding (Gasteiner et al, 2015). The postfeeding pH drop is the consequence of the sudden abundance of nutrients, as the digestive activity of the microbiota produces acidity during fermentation and saliva is not produced in sufficient quantities (normally 200-250 l/day) to compensate for that acidity (Gasteiner et al, 2009).…”
Section: Effect Of Feeding On Daily Patterns Of Ruminal Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atypical meal patterns (Oetzel, 2007), problems with feed preparation (Leonardi and Armentano, 2003) or with the feeding time-schedule (Kleen et al, 2003) can increase the risk of SARA. Component feeding puts cows at a greater risk of developing SARA than TMR feeding, because animals are at risk of overconsuming concentrates and an increased diurnal variation in rumen pH (Stone, 2004;Gasteiner et al, 2015).…”
Section: Prevalence and Risk Factors Of Saramentioning
confidence: 99%