2023
DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biofilm dysbiosis and caries activity: a surface or an individual issue?

Laís Daniela EV,
Joice Faria POLONI,
Nailê DAMÉ-TEIXEIRA
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interactions in a biofilm, which can ultimately become cariogenic, are therefore the subject of current research and are difficult to simulate under in vitro conditions. The exact identification of the cariogenic microorganisms is also inconclusive, but Streptococcus mutans, as examined in this study, has the highest detection rate in caries patients (Bhaumik et al, 2021;Ev et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interactions in a biofilm, which can ultimately become cariogenic, are therefore the subject of current research and are difficult to simulate under in vitro conditions. The exact identification of the cariogenic microorganisms is also inconclusive, but Streptococcus mutans, as examined in this study, has the highest detection rate in caries patients (Bhaumik et al, 2021;Ev et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The interactions in a biofilm, which can ultimately become cariogenic, are therefore the subject of current research and are difficult to simulate under in vitro conditions. The exact identification of the cariogenic microorganisms is also inconclusive, but Streptococcus mutans, as examined in this study, has the highest detection rate in caries patients (Bhaumik et al, 2021; Ev et al, 2023). An exemplary observation of a single species therefore does not represent the complexity or resilience of a biofilm, but can provide reliable findings before more complex or even in vivo tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%