2021
DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of final irrigation with sodium hypochlorite at different temperatures on postoperative pain level and antibacterial activity: a randomized controlled clinical study

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effect of final irrigation of root canals with NaOCl solution at different temperatures on postoperative pain level and antimicrobial activity. Methodology: 45 patients were randomly divided into three groups using a web program according to the irrigation selected: NaOCl 2ºC, NaOCl 25ºC and NaOCl 45ºC. First root canal samples were collected before treatment (S1). After chemo-mechanical preparation, final irrigation was performed with the selected irrigant (NaOCl 2ºC, NaOCl 25ºC and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Seventeen articles were eliminated due to the following causes: ten studies were still ongoing [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], two studies were in vitro [36,37], two studies were critical appraisals [38,39], one paper was a letter to the editor [40], one was an editorial paper [41], and one study had no control group [42]. Therefore, 16 studies were involved in the systematic review [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. Seven of the sixteen studies documented their results as percentages, which were excluded from the meta-analysis [43,44,47,50,52,55,56].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Seventeen articles were eliminated due to the following causes: ten studies were still ongoing [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], two studies were in vitro [36,37], two studies were critical appraisals [38,39], one paper was a letter to the editor [40], one was an editorial paper [41], and one study had no control group [42]. Therefore, 16 studies were involved in the systematic review [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. Seven of the sixteen studies documented their results as percentages, which were excluded from the meta-analysis [43,44,47,50,52,55,56].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven of the sixteen studies documented their results as percentages, which were excluded from the meta-analysis [43,44,47,50,52,55,56]. Nine studies involving 878 participants were included in the meta-analysis [45,46,48,49,51,53,54,57,58]. The main features of the sixteen included articles are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations