2020
DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micro-computed tomographic assessment of the variability and morphological features of root canal system and their ramifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of this study was to examine the root canal system morphology of mandibular canines (MaCa) with a solid sample size (n = 101), thus, allowing a reliable statistical evaluation. Different research methods, such as decalcifying and ink dye 7 , radiographic imaging 5 , cross-sectional 24 , CBCT imaging 8 , 9 , 25 28 and micro-CT imaging 13 , 14 , have been used to examine root canal morphologies. The cross-sectional and decalcification methods demand, at least to a certain extent, a sample destruction; furthermore, with the cross-sectional method, due to the slice thickness, an accurate reconstruction of the internal morphology becomes burdensome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this study was to examine the root canal system morphology of mandibular canines (MaCa) with a solid sample size (n = 101), thus, allowing a reliable statistical evaluation. Different research methods, such as decalcifying and ink dye 7 , radiographic imaging 5 , cross-sectional 24 , CBCT imaging 8 , 9 , 25 28 and micro-CT imaging 13 , 14 , have been used to examine root canal morphologies. The cross-sectional and decalcification methods demand, at least to a certain extent, a sample destruction; furthermore, with the cross-sectional method, due to the slice thickness, an accurate reconstruction of the internal morphology becomes burdensome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methodologies have been used to study the internal and external anatomy of the teeth, such as conventional and digital radiography, clearing techniques, cross-sectioning, scanning electron microscopy, and stereomicroscope 4 , 16 18 . Nowadays, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) is considered the gold standard for anatomical studies due to it being a non-invasive and reproducible technique that allows a qualitative and quantitative 3D-characterization of the teeth morphology 19 , 20 . Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the root anatomy and canal system morphology of mandibular first premolars obtained from a Chilean population using micro-CT. Internal morphology was analyzed using Vertucci’s and Ahmed’s criteria, and external morphology was analyzed using the ASUDAS scoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various research methods have been used to examine root canal morphologies, such as decalcifying and ink dye [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 42 ], radiographic [ 15 ], cross-sectional [ 12 ], CBCT imaging [ 6 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ], and micro-CT imaging [ 34 , 37 ]. While the sectioning method requires the destruction of the specimens and, due to the thickness of the slices, an exact reconstruction of the canal anatomy is not possible, radiographic examination is a largely subjective method that is difficult to interpret.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CBCT images do not provide images that are as high-resolution as those of micro-CT, it appears to be a good method to examine root canal configurations [ 3 , 43 ]. Few studies have investigated the MaCa root canal morphology by means of micro-CT [ 33 , 34 , 37 , 38 ]. However, those investigating morphological parameters different from the ones in the systematic review investigated other topics than root canal configuration; thus, they did not meet the inclusion criteria and could not be considered in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation