2015
DOI: 10.1590/1678-7153.201528211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution to the validation of the Kutcher Adolescent Depression Scale (KADS-6) in a Portuguese population

Abstract: The KADS-6 is a self-report assessment instrument known for its ease application in assessing depression in young people. This study aimed to contribute to the validation of the Portuguese version of this tool and analyze its psychometric characteristics in comparison with other self-report instruments for depression in adolescents, in Portugal. Two samples were collected, a non-clinical group of in school youth (n=773; 52.4% male) and a clinical sample (n=134 youth; 44% male). Comparisons also used the Beck D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous research (Mojs et al, 2015;Lowe et al, 2018;Quintão et al, 2015), one clear component emerged from the principal components analysis of the KADS-6. This component included all six items of the measure assessing the three key elements of depressive symptomsaffective, cognitive, and somatic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with previous research (Mojs et al, 2015;Lowe et al, 2018;Quintão et al, 2015), one clear component emerged from the principal components analysis of the KADS-6. This component included all six items of the measure assessing the three key elements of depressive symptomsaffective, cognitive, and somatic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In our Colombian sample, the internal consistency reliability of KADS-6 were slightly lower (α = .72 validation and .69 cross-validation) than those found in other studies (Mojs, et al, 2015; Quintão, et al, 2015). However, those other studies used youth who were much older (12–24 years of age) than those who participated in our study (8–13 years of age).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations