2018
DOI: 10.1590/1678-6971/eramg180100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auto Evaluations of Distance Management Training in a Federal Autarchy

Abstract: It is not allowed the use for commercial purposes. Este artigo pode ser copiado, distribuído, exibido, transmitido ou adaptado desde que citados, de forma clara e explícita, o nome da revista, a edição, o ano e as páginas nas quais o artigo foi publicado originalmente, mas sem sugerir que a RAM endosse a reutilização do artigo. Esse termo de licenciamento deve ser explicitado para os casos de reutilização ou distribuição para terceiros. Não é permitido o uso para fins comerciais. ABSTRACT Purpose: The self-eva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The instrument used to describe the training program was the Theoretical Model presented in Figure 1, which allowed the investigation of issues related to context, inputs, activities, products, and results. This theoretical model was elaborated based on the Logical Model (Damasceno et al, 2012;McLaughlin & Jordan, 2010;Souza et al, 2017) associated with theories of instructional design (Abbad et al, 2006;Borges-Andrade, 2002) and summative evaluation models, especially, the IMPACT Evaluation Model (Abbad et al, 2006;Richter, 2018).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The instrument used to describe the training program was the Theoretical Model presented in Figure 1, which allowed the investigation of issues related to context, inputs, activities, products, and results. This theoretical model was elaborated based on the Logical Model (Damasceno et al, 2012;McLaughlin & Jordan, 2010;Souza et al, 2017) associated with theories of instructional design (Abbad et al, 2006;Borges-Andrade, 2002) and summative evaluation models, especially, the IMPACT Evaluation Model (Abbad et al, 2006;Richter, 2018).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional evaluation models are based on results, among them, the Kirkpatrick model (1976), with four levels of assessment (reaction to training, learning, behavior in the position, and results), is the most used. The summative and integrated evaluation models in TD&E are based on the approach of instructional systems and were developed to evaluate not only the results but all variables that could interfere and predict the expected training effects (Borges-Andrade, 2002;Richter, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations