2018
DOI: 10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-4707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retenção de placenta e endometrite subclínica: prevalência e relação com o desempenho reprodutivo de vacas leiteiras mestiças

Abstract: RESUMO: Objetivou-se avaliar os efeitos do tipo de parto (eutócico vs. distócico) e do período do ano (chuvoso vs. seco) sobre a prevalência de retenção de placenta (RP) e de endometrite subclínica (ES), verificar a relação entre as duas patologias, e os efeitos dessas sobre a taxa de descarte, o período de serviço (PS) e número de IA/concepção. A RP foi avaliada no primeiro dia pós-parto (DPP). A citologia endometrial foi realizada entre 30 e 80 DPP, considerando positivos casos contendo acima de 5% de neutró… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Uterine disease as retained placenta (RP), increases the rst service interval and decreases conception rate (Fourichon et al ,2000). Still, Buso et al (2018) observed that cows with RP had 46 extra days open, 19.4% culling rate and the number of arti cial insemination (AI) was signi cantly higher when compared to healthy cows. A relevant impact of RP is the decrease in the milk production (Dubuc et al, 2011), resulting in 355 liters less in the rst 60 days of lactation (Sheldon et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uterine disease as retained placenta (RP), increases the rst service interval and decreases conception rate (Fourichon et al ,2000). Still, Buso et al (2018) observed that cows with RP had 46 extra days open, 19.4% culling rate and the number of arti cial insemination (AI) was signi cantly higher when compared to healthy cows. A relevant impact of RP is the decrease in the milk production (Dubuc et al, 2011), resulting in 355 liters less in the rst 60 days of lactation (Sheldon et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%