2017
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2016-0017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide association study for birth, weaning and yearling weight in Colombian Brahman cattle

Abstract: Genotypic and phenotypic data of 1,562 animals were analyzed to find genomic regions that potentially influence the birth weight (BW), weaning weight at seven months of age (WW) and yearling weight (YW) of Colombian Brahman cattle, with genotyping conducted using Illumina Bead chip array with 74,669 SNPs. A Single Step Genomic BLUP (ssGBLP), approach was used to estimate the proportion of variance explained by each marker. Multiple regions scattered across the genome were found to influence weights at differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(27 reference statements)
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, many QTL regions with genome-wide significance for additive genetic effects were identified [see Additional file 1 : Tables S1, S2 and S3]. For most of the traits studied, peaks for significant additive SNPs across the three datasets were on BTA6 followed by BTA7 and 14 (see Additional file 2 : Figures S13, S14, S15, S16, S17 and S18), which correspond to previously identified QTL [ 3 , 33 36 ]. These additive SNPs can contribute to the process of building consensus beef cattle QTL effects and can also provide a starting point for mapping the underlying candidate genes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the current study, many QTL regions with genome-wide significance for additive genetic effects were identified [see Additional file 1 : Tables S1, S2 and S3]. For most of the traits studied, peaks for significant additive SNPs across the three datasets were on BTA6 followed by BTA7 and 14 (see Additional file 2 : Figures S13, S14, S15, S16, S17 and S18), which correspond to previously identified QTL [ 3 , 33 36 ]. These additive SNPs can contribute to the process of building consensus beef cattle QTL effects and can also provide a starting point for mapping the underlying candidate genes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Growth traits such as birth weight, weaning weight, pre-weaning daily gain and yearling weight are economically important traits in beef cattle, which are traditionally included in the selection criteria of beef cattle breeding programs [ 48 ] because they are moderately to highly heritable [ 13 ] and are genetically correlated to carcass and meat quality traits [ 49 ]. Several QTL that underlie the variation of growth traits have been detected in several GWAS on different beef cattle populations (Table 2 ) [ 5 , 32 , 34 36 ]. SNPS were generally mapped to nearly all of the chromosomes, except BTA3, 9, 10 12, 13, 19, 20 23, 24 and 26 [ 34 36 ] and were linked to several candidate genes that differed from those detected in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main advantages of BON is that there is a low frequency of dystocia, resistance to diseases and good weight gains despite poor nutritional conditions. Its performance is similar to that of other Creole, Zebu and European breeds in the region ( Vásquez et al, 2006 ; Baldi et al, 2010 ; Martínez et al, 2017 ; Palacios-Espinosa et al, 2019 ). A wide range was found for the different traits, and coefficients of variation were between 10.92 and 15.76, which may be explained by the diverse pasture, the grazing periods and type of pastures used to feed the animals in the different herds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, Table 2. Top 10 windows explaining the highest proportion of genetic variance for feet and legs binary score (FL1) in Nellore cattle association studies of SNPs for production, carcass and reproductive traits have identified common genomic regions using small population sizes in beef cattle (e.g., Cesar et al, 2014;Martínez et al, 2017;Olivieri et al, 2017;Seabury et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%