2020
DOI: 10.1590/1678-460x2020360306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desejo na biopolítica do agora: performatividades escalares em um aplicativo de encontros homoafetivos

Abstract: RESUMO Com base na biopolítica do agora - um processo que envolve tanto a reocidentalização do mundo como a estabilidade dinâmica contemporânea - e em uma ideologia linguística performativa, este artigo relata uma etnografia da mobilidade em um aplicativo para encontros homoafetivos. Analisam-se performatividades escalares interseccionais de gênero, sexualidade e raça. São usados também os construtos teórico-analíticos de indexicalidade e escalas, que operam na compreensão de como os corpos são semiotizados no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second limit has to do with focus: "If we only privilege the analysis of practices of social control, ideological domination, discursive hegemony, sociolinguistic orders or dominant ideologies, we block our perception, and even our own imagination, to those voices that act for change" (p. 75). Bonnin's conclusion resonates with similar ones in studies on agency, resistance, and hope (e.g., Awayed-Bishara, 2021;Charalambous, Charalambous, Zembylas, & Theodorou, 2020;Milani, 2022;Mahmood, 2001Mahmood, , 2005Moita Lopes, 2020;, as well as our own perception of the agentive, non-melancholic, and proactive stance of faveladas/os when faced with the dynamics of social domination. In this regard, Mattingly's (2010) words about the frictional interplay of structure and agency are as critical as they are blunt: "Reality needs to be exposed as a space of possibility and not only of imprisonment or structural reproduction.…”
Section: Hope In Sociolinguisticssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The second limit has to do with focus: "If we only privilege the analysis of practices of social control, ideological domination, discursive hegemony, sociolinguistic orders or dominant ideologies, we block our perception, and even our own imagination, to those voices that act for change" (p. 75). Bonnin's conclusion resonates with similar ones in studies on agency, resistance, and hope (e.g., Awayed-Bishara, 2021;Charalambous, Charalambous, Zembylas, & Theodorou, 2020;Milani, 2022;Mahmood, 2001Mahmood, , 2005Moita Lopes, 2020;, as well as our own perception of the agentive, non-melancholic, and proactive stance of faveladas/os when faced with the dynamics of social domination. In this regard, Mattingly's (2010) words about the frictional interplay of structure and agency are as critical as they are blunt: "Reality needs to be exposed as a space of possibility and not only of imprisonment or structural reproduction.…”
Section: Hope In Sociolinguisticssupporting
confidence: 66%