2020
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4499.20200053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of organic liquid fertilizers on biological activities and fruit productivity in open-field cherry tomato

Abstract: This study evaluated the effects of liquid fertilizers (LF) with farm-derived renewable resources on biological activities and chemical attributes of the soil and fruit in an open-field tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum var. cerasiforme) experiment conducted in South Korea in the 2019 growing season. The LF treatments included bone+fish meal (BF), fish+phosphoric acid (FP), sesame oil (SO), starfish (SF), nontreatment (NT) as control, and oil cake (OC) as an organic fertilizer, fertigating two times per week dur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…LNT plots showed decreasing numbers of OTUs and a richness estimator of Chao1 with respect to the bacterial community, although the Good's coverage and diversity were similar in all treatment plots (Table 3). The 69.5% of phylum were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Acidobacteria of the 16S rRNA gene sequence obtained from all the soil samples (Figure 2), which are the common phyla observed in the arable land [10,18,19]. Low nutrient accumulation and low soil pH increased Actinobacteria with relatively low competitiveness but reduced Proteobacteria [10,[19][20][21], which was observed on the LNT treatment plots.…”
Section: Soil Bio-physical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…LNT plots showed decreasing numbers of OTUs and a richness estimator of Chao1 with respect to the bacterial community, although the Good's coverage and diversity were similar in all treatment plots (Table 3). The 69.5% of phylum were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Acidobacteria of the 16S rRNA gene sequence obtained from all the soil samples (Figure 2), which are the common phyla observed in the arable land [10,18,19]. Low nutrient accumulation and low soil pH increased Actinobacteria with relatively low competitiveness but reduced Proteobacteria [10,[19][20][21], which was observed on the LNT treatment plots.…”
Section: Soil Bio-physical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The 69.5% of phylum were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Acidobacteria of the 16S rRNA gene sequence obtained from all the soil samples (Figure 2), which are the common phyla observed in the arable land [10,18,19]. Low nutrient accumulation and low soil pH increased Actinobacteria with relatively low competitiveness but reduced Proteobacteria [10,[19][20][21], which was observed on the LNT treatment plots. The number of invertebrates increased in the BF and SF treatment plots but decreased in LNT plots (Figure 3A),which was likely associated with the concentration of T-C and EC observed in the LF solutions.…”
Section: Soil Bio-physical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations