2017
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4499.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of microsatellites for evaluation of genetic diversity in cherry tomato

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The PIC values ranged from 0.0 to 0.68 and the mean value was 0.44. Microsatellite markers used to study genetic variability in tomato populations found a mean PIC of 0.63, with a maximum value of 0.81 and a minimum of 0.17 (Aguirre et al, 2017). Moreover, the lower mean value reported in the present study is due to the greater amount of polymorphic markers used in comparison to the others studies, which explains the mean value of lower PIC.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…The PIC values ranged from 0.0 to 0.68 and the mean value was 0.44. Microsatellite markers used to study genetic variability in tomato populations found a mean PIC of 0.63, with a maximum value of 0.81 and a minimum of 0.17 (Aguirre et al, 2017). Moreover, the lower mean value reported in the present study is due to the greater amount of polymorphic markers used in comparison to the others studies, which explains the mean value of lower PIC.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Thus, the markers developed within this study and their relationship to the various parameters considered provide opportunities to select parents for crossbreeding in tomato breeding programmes, which is an important measure to generate new Bolivian cultivars [ 42 ]. The present study also contributed novel knowledge on the genetic diversity and population structure of Bolivian tomatoes, as previous studies have only included Bolivian accessions of cherry tomatoes [ 43 ] and its wild relatives S. lycopersicum var. ceraciforme and S. neorickii [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…With all SSR markers was obtained a lower number of detectable bands, sometimes weak, or no bands for the last three plants (number 8, 9 and 10) acclimatized to ex vitro conditions (Figure 4). SSRs have been the most widely used markers for genotyping plants over the past 25 years because they are highly informative, codominant, multi-allele genetic markers that are experimentally reproducible and transferable among related species (Gheorghe et al, 2010;Shirasawa et al, 2014;Aguirre et al, 2017;Al-Shammari and Hamdi 2021). However, when using this type of molecular marker to distinguish between various genotypes, we must consider that SSRs have a high mutation rate.…”
Section: Morphological Aspects Comparisons Between Regenerated and Do...mentioning
confidence: 99%