2017
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4162-9076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desempenhos produtivo e reprodutivo de um rebanho F1 Holandês x Gir em Minas Gerais

Abstract: RESUMOObjetivou-se avaliar os desempenhos produtivo e reprodutivo de vacas F1 Holandês x Gir Minas Gerais, as quais foram mantidas em sistema de produção a pasto no verão, com suplementação de concentrado, e, no inverno, alimentadas com cana-de-açúcar, polpa de citros e concentrado. As características avaliadas foram: idade ao primeiro parto, intervalo parto-primeiro serviço, período de serviço, intervalo de partos, permanência da matriz no rebanho, produção de leite total por lactação, duração da lactação, pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result fits within the average described by Radostits et al (1994), 60-70%, as being the ideal for pregnancy rate at the first service of heifers. The average age at first delivery was 42.82 months old, equaling the national average according to Ribeiro et al (2017). These same authors used 176 F1 crossbred heifers (Holstein × Gir) and obtained an average of 33.36 months for the first calving, while Balancin Júnior et al 2014found 30.71 months for 1435 F1 Holstein versus Gir heifers, 32.73 months for 1412 ¾ heifers and 33.85 months of age for 372 ⅞ animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result fits within the average described by Radostits et al (1994), 60-70%, as being the ideal for pregnancy rate at the first service of heifers. The average age at first delivery was 42.82 months old, equaling the national average according to Ribeiro et al (2017). These same authors used 176 F1 crossbred heifers (Holstein × Gir) and obtained an average of 33.36 months for the first calving, while Balancin Júnior et al 2014found 30.71 months for 1435 F1 Holstein versus Gir heifers, 32.73 months for 1412 ¾ heifers and 33.85 months of age for 372 ⅞ animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the work by Ribeiro et al (2017), heifers were kept in batches in continuous grazing with pasture of Brachiaria sp., and in the periods of drought, they received a complete mineral-protein mixture (35% crude protein) and in the rainy season, a complete mineral-energy mixture (20% crude protein) with a small proportion of urea. However, in the work carried out by Balancin Júnior et al (2014), the animals were kept in pasture formed by grasses such as Brachiaria brizantha cv Marandu, Panicum maximum cv Tanzania, Cynodon dactylon × Cynodon nlenfuensis and Cynodon plectostachyus; and during the drought period, they received corn silage and sugar cane as a bulk supplement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of genetic groups in the dairy herds is in agreement with Madalena et al (2012), who stated that there is a plurality of blood compositions, making management more difficult. A higher frequency of the ½ Hol + ½ Gir (25.20%) genetic group was noted, as these are animals adapted to the tropical environment (RIBEIRO et al, 2017) and have a higher degree of heterosis, since they further express traits of productive and economical interest. Consequently, they are more efficient in production systems with low management levels, as reported by Ribeiro et al (2017) and Pires et al (2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Production systems under tropical conditions have largely relied on the crossing of Zebu breeds, of excellent adaptability, with breeds of European origin, specialized in milk production (RIBEIRO et al, 2017). In general, this is due to serious problems of adaptation in pure animals of specialized breeds, to tropical conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the random effect of the farm was considered in all models to adjust for factors such as the effects of management, genetics, and other possible factors causing variation among farms. Data on HH and WH were modeled up to the age of 30 months for heifers that had not calved, comprising the recommended age of 22 to 24 months for average at first calving (AFC) for European cattle Pietersma et al, 2006) plus 6 months for late puberty genetic groups such as H×G heifers (Facó et al, 2005;McManus et al, 2008;Delgado et al, 2012;Ribeiro et al, 2017;Canaza-Cayo et al, 2018;Azevedo et al, 2020). BW data for all cows and heifers were used without an age limit.…”
Section: Evaluated Non-linear Models and Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%