2016
DOI: 10.1590/1677-5449.004216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análise de concordância em estudos clínicos e experimentais

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
12

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
35
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The graph proposed by Bland-Altman was used, with the measures estimated and measured, to analyze agreement between them 15 . The limits of agreement are estimated by the mean difference (± 1.96), assuming that the differences are normally distributed 16 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graph proposed by Bland-Altman was used, with the measures estimated and measured, to analyze agreement between them 15 . The limits of agreement are estimated by the mean difference (± 1.96), assuming that the differences are normally distributed 16 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Após a coleta, os dados foram digitados em planilha de Excel e analisados pelo Statistical Package the Social Sciences (SPSS) -versão 23. Para avaliar o grau de concordância entre os instrumentos de dependência foi obtida a concordância observada conforme proposto pelo índice de concordância de Kappa adotando o intervalo de confiança de 95% 14 .…”
Section: Materiais E Métodounclassified
“…However, researchers very often use them erroneously to test agreement of data or consecutive measures of the same phenomenon (for example, test-retest, 29 calibration of measurement instruments, interrater comparisons), even though there are more appropriate methods for these purposes. 30 Finally, strategies for evaluation of correlations between variables should be encouraged in clinical and biomedical research, since they maximize understanding of the phenomena studied. However, due to the peculiarities inherent to the different methods, they must be described in detail in the methodology and in the presentation of results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%