Wild pig (Sus scrofa L.) occupancy patterns in the Brazilian Atlantic forest

Abstract

Despite the great impacts of invasive wild pig (Sus scrofa) to natural ecosystems, habitat use by this species in the neotropics remains poorly studied. Here, we investigated the effects of local habitat and landscape covariates (vegetation types, running watercourses and roads) on occupancy patterns of wild pig in the Atlantic Forest of southern Brazil. We used single season occupancy modeling to estimate detection (p) and occupancy (ψ) probabilities, using 8-day camera-trap monitoring of 100 sampled sites. The cameras detected wild pig in 64 sites (naïve occupancy = 64 %). The four best models explained 72.7 % of the occupancy patterns, and the top model (with "water" variable) had a weight of 28.5 %. Even though none of the tested variables had high explanatory power of wild pig occupancy, the water variable had a negative effect trend (β = -1.124; SE = 0.734), with 59 % of occupancy when water was present and 82 % when it was absent around the sampling sites. Vestiges of the presence of wild pig in different vegetation types revealed that they used plantations of Pinus sp., native forests, and corn and oat crops. The occupation pattern shows that wild pig are generalist at our study site at the Atlantic Forest being found everywhere, raising ecological and economic concerns about the high potential negative effects of its invasion.

One Health at gunpoint: Impact of wild boars as exotic species in Brazil - A review

“…Wild boars may be a distinct example of a One Health impact, caused and maintained in the past decades by illegal anthropic actions in several countries, particularly as exotic species in Brazil [ 95 ] and USA [ 96 ]. Human greed and commercial activities guided by hunting culminated on wild boar release, intentional scape and spreading in all six Brazilian biomes, including national and state preservation units, agricultural lands, and livestock pastures, with similar wide spreading in the USA, invading 35/50 (70%) states [ 97 , 98 ]. Surprisingly, wild boars have been reportedly indicated as a One Health concern worldwide only (and recently) for circulating zoonotic protozoa and viruses in Portugal [ 99 ] and dissemination of antimicrobial resistant E. coli in Northern Italy, suggesting wild boar role as antibiotic resistance spreader, requesting inclusion in surveillance programs [ 100 ].…”

The Boar War: Five Hot Factors Unleashing Boar Expansion and Related Emergency

“…Moving the individuals into non-native range distributions, potentially alarming situations could arise for both the environment and the indigenous fauna and flora, where boar are invasive [17,43,67,[211][212][213][214][215][216]. Indeed, allochthonous individuals more easily could invade ecological niches unattended by indigenous populations.…”

Managing African Swine Fever: Assessing the Potential of Camera Traps in Monitoring Wild Boar Occupancy Trends in Infected and Non-infected Zones, Using Spatio-Temporal Statistical Models

“…Over the last decade, the use of remote cameras, henceforth referred to as camera traps (CTs), has become popular when monitoring trends in medium-size to large-size mammals, including wild boar (7,8). Photographic captures (i.e., detections) by CTs can be translated into information on the distribution and density of a focal species.…”