2018
DOI: 10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2017-0417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The bats of Rio Grande do Norte state, northeastern Brazil

Abstract: Rio Grande do Norte is one of the smallest states in Brazil but has a rich diversity of ecosystems, including Caatinga vegetation, remnants of Atlantic Forest, coastal habitats, mangroves and large karstic areas with caves. However, its chiropteran fauna is little known, and the state contains conspicuous gaps of information on the occurrence and distribution of bats in Brazil. In order to reduce this information gap, based on a review of scientific literature and regional mammal collections, we list 42 specie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, only 42 species of bats are known to occur for Rio Grande do Norte (Barros 2014; Barros et al 2017;Cordero-Schmidt et al 2017;Vargas-Mena et al 2018), which is still considered a low richness when compared to nearby states such as Pernambuco (n = 73), Paraíba (n = 63) and Ceará (n = 62) (Garcia et al 2014). The present study provides the first data on the bat fauna of the coastal restingas of Rio Grande do Norte.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…So far, only 42 species of bats are known to occur for Rio Grande do Norte (Barros 2014; Barros et al 2017;Cordero-Schmidt et al 2017;Vargas-Mena et al 2018), which is still considered a low richness when compared to nearby states such as Pernambuco (n = 73), Paraíba (n = 63) and Ceará (n = 62) (Garcia et al 2014). The present study provides the first data on the bat fauna of the coastal restingas of Rio Grande do Norte.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…A lacuna para quirópteros era igualmente grande até levantamentos recentes (e.g. Vargas-Mena et al 2018). Diferente dos estados vizinhos, o Rio Grande do Norte não foi visitado por expedições históricas, que realizadas a partir do século XVII impulsionaram o conhecimento sobre mamíferos no restante do nordeste do Brasil (Feijó & Langguth 2013).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…We used carcasses of house mice ( Mus musculus ; C57BL/6 strain) and chicks (from domestic chickens; 1 day old) acquired in animal houses and shops, and carcasses of bats (flat‐faced fruit‐eating bat) collected in urban areas 30 days before each test. We used flat‐faced fruit‐eating bats because they are very abundant in the study area (Barros 2019) and in the state of Rio Grande do Norte in general (Barros et al 2017, Vargas‐Mena et al 2018). We killed all animals by cervical dislocation, and immediately froze the carcasses and kept them at −18ºC for a maximum of 30 days until we used them in the trials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%