2016
DOI: 10.1590/1519-6984.07315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental indicators in effluent assessment of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) reared in raceway system through phosphorus and nitrogen

Abstract: The phosphorus and nitrogen discharge via effluent of intensive trout farming system was quantified through the use of environmental indicators. The nutrient loads, the mass balance, the estimated amount of nutrients in feed and the amount of nutrients converted in fish biomass were calculated based on the concentrations of phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) in the feed and in the water. Of the offered feed, 24.75 kg were available as P and 99.00 kg as N, of these, 9.32 kg P (38%) and 29.12 kg N (25%) were conver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Brazil, indicators proposed by Boyd and Queiroz (2001) and Boyd et al (2007) were evaluated by Moraes et al (2016), in a trout farming system (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and was observed that from the total N and P offered feed, 25% of N and 38% of P were converted into fish biomass and 75 of N and 62% of P were exported via effluent. These authors attributed the values to the management practices, such as excessive amount and low quality of feed offered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Brazil, indicators proposed by Boyd and Queiroz (2001) and Boyd et al (2007) were evaluated by Moraes et al (2016), in a trout farming system (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and was observed that from the total N and P offered feed, 25% of N and 38% of P were converted into fish biomass and 75 of N and 62% of P were exported via effluent. These authors attributed the values to the management practices, such as excessive amount and low quality of feed offered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, although scarce studies performed in trout farming (Caramel et al, 2014;Moraes et al, 2015Moraes et al, , 2016, in bullfrog farming (Borges et al, 2012;Mercante et al, 2014) and in polyculture system (tilapia and shrimps) (Araújo-Silva et al, 2014), showed that environmental indicators can be a useful tool for characterizing the impact, since it allows the comparison of different systems, methods of creation, evaluation of the effectiveness of management practices used in the production system, descriptions of general standards and as reference values (Boyd et al, 2007;Kimpara et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The products of fish metabolism, remains of food, and dissolved nutrients from fish farms are the main pollutants released by them [41], and they represent one of the most frequent problems in pollution of the recipient [42]. Only about 30% of fish food is transformed into biomass of the object of aquaculture, while the remainder flows into the recipient and constitutes the most important parameter when considering the influence of a fish farm on an aquatic environment [43,44]. In view of this and the fact that certain amounts of phosphorus and nitrogen (which fish food contains) can cause eutrophication, in the present study, for comparison of the effects of trout farms with different production capacities, we selected the same type of fish food (see Materials and Methods).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feeding practices necessary to sustain semi-intensive and intensive fish farming systems contribute to the input of large amounts of nutrients into the water. No more than 25% of N and 30% of P added to fishponds as feed are converted into fish biomass (Moraes et al, 2016;Chatvijitkul et al, 2017;David et al, 2017a;2017b;Osti et al, 2018a). Additionally, overfeeding or the use of unbalanced feed reduces the absorption of nutrients by fish, which can result in excess of organic matter and nutrients in production systems, with direct consequences on water quality, favoring their assimilation by phytoplankton and aquatic macrophytes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%