2023
DOI: 10.1590/1517-7076-rmat-2023-0115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture mechanics analysis of a fatigue failure of a parabolic spring

Mirco Daniel Chapetti,
Bojan Senčič,
Nenad Gubeljak

Abstract: This study analyzed the fatigue failure of a parabolic spring made of 51CrV4 steel. A fracture mechanics approach was used to quantify the driving force and resistance for different loading configurations, inclusion sizes, and residual stresses. The analysis considered surface and internal initiation processes, including the impact of residual stresses introduced by shot peening. Key findings include the ability of the methodology to analyze the variables influencing fatigue resistance and failure configuratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure for the determination of ∆K th is illustrated in Figure 8. According to the gathered data presented in Figure 8, ∆K th is the value of ∆K when N/N th = 1, which corresponds to the crack length that stops to propagate; this resulted in a ∆K th of 6.92 MPa √ m for σ = 0.1 (very close to the value observed in [40] of 5 MPa √ m), 5.78, and 5.39 MPa √ m for R σ = 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5, respectively. In [41,42], the same steel grade was tested for R σ = 0.1 (with a 10 mm thick specimen), for a martensitic material (without tempering) and for a steel grade with a ferrite/pearlitic microstructure.…”
Section: Threshold Stress Intensity Factor Rangesupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The procedure for the determination of ∆K th is illustrated in Figure 8. According to the gathered data presented in Figure 8, ∆K th is the value of ∆K when N/N th = 1, which corresponds to the crack length that stops to propagate; this resulted in a ∆K th of 6.92 MPa √ m for σ = 0.1 (very close to the value observed in [40] of 5 MPa √ m), 5.78, and 5.39 MPa √ m for R σ = 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5, respectively. In [41,42], the same steel grade was tested for R σ = 0.1 (with a 10 mm thick specimen), for a martensitic material (without tempering) and for a steel grade with a ferrite/pearlitic microstructure.…”
Section: Threshold Stress Intensity Factor Rangesupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The average value found for K c was 138.37 ± 2.61 MPa √ m (see The procedure for the determination of ∆K th is illustrated in Figure 8. According to the gathered data presented in Figure 8, ∆K th is the value of ∆K for the moment that N/N th = 1, which corresponds to the crack length that stops to propagate, which results in a ∆K th of 6.92 MPa √ m for R σ = 0.1 (very close to the observed in [40] (5 MPa √ m)), 5.78, and 5.39 MPa √ m for R σ = 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5, respectively.…”
Section: Critical Stress Intensity Factorsupporting
confidence: 65%