2020
DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2019-0544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lisdexamfetamine to improve excessive daytime sleepiness and weight management in narcolepsy: a case series

Abstract: Objective: To report the successful use of lisdexamfetamine in the management of narcolepsy. Methods: Five narcoleptic patients received lisdexamfetamine, at different dosages and for different periods, for management of excessive daytime sleepiness and weight control. Results: All patients experienced improvement of excessive daytime sleepiness and lost weight without side effects. Conclusion: Lisdexamfetamine appears promising for the treatment of two of the most common symptoms of narcolepsy: excessive dayt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, further research is needed to establish the efficacy and safety of this drug. 57 We highlight the use of atypical stimulants known as modafinil and armodafinil, which are included in many guidelines around the world for narcolepsy treatment. 54 Modafinil improves wakefulness at 100 to 400 mg doses in adults but does not affect controlling cataplexy.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, further research is needed to establish the efficacy and safety of this drug. 57 We highlight the use of atypical stimulants known as modafinil and armodafinil, which are included in many guidelines around the world for narcolepsy treatment. 54 Modafinil improves wakefulness at 100 to 400 mg doses in adults but does not affect controlling cataplexy.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, evidence from meta-analyses is frequently biased, and the credibility of the claimed associations between putative risk or protective factors for personality disorders remains unknown. To fill this gap in the literature, we conducted an umbrella review focused on environmental risk and protective factors for personality disorders, to identify and measure possible methodological limitations and sources of bias in the published and unpublished evidence, which might have underestimated or inflated claimed associations, as previously shown in several previous umbrella reviews on risk factors for mental disorders or obesity ( 13 17 ). Therefore, the aim of this umbrella review was to grade the evidence from meta-analyses of cohort and case–control studies on protective and risk factors for personality disorders accounting for several sources of bias and applying established quantitative criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%