2018
DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The slant of the forehead as a craniofacial feature of impulsiveness

Abstract: The angle of inclination of the forehead was significantly associated with self-reported impulsiveness in this sample of traffic violators.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, despite the existence of individual differences in the profile view of the slant of the forehead (Adams et al, 2013;Oh et al, 2016;Guerrero et al, 2016;Guerrero et al, 2018a,) an aspect that can trigger some controversy is the anthropometric measurement SFD. However, a recent study found a high level of interobserver agreement in the visual assessment of the level of the forehead slant, whose measurement obtained a high correlation with the anthropometric SFD measurement (Guerrero et al, 2016;Guerrero et al, 2018a). This backs up the validity of the anthropometric SFD measurement used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, despite the existence of individual differences in the profile view of the slant of the forehead (Adams et al, 2013;Oh et al, 2016;Guerrero et al, 2016;Guerrero et al, 2018a,) an aspect that can trigger some controversy is the anthropometric measurement SFD. However, a recent study found a high level of interobserver agreement in the visual assessment of the level of the forehead slant, whose measurement obtained a high correlation with the anthropometric SFD measurement (Guerrero et al, 2016;Guerrero et al, 2018a). This backs up the validity of the anthropometric SFD measurement used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average of the three SFD measurements was used in the analyses. The same method has been used in previous investigations (Guerrero et al, 2016;Guerrero-Apolo et al, 2018a: Guerrero-Apolo et al, 2018b.…”
Section: Measurement Of the Slant Forehead Degreesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding specific facial variables, fWHR is one of the most studied, with evidence that linked it with leadership in both competitive and prosocial environments (Hahn et al, 2017), integrity (Ormiston et al, 2017), sexual desire, sociosexuality and fidelity intention (Arnocky et al, 2017) and some psychopathic personality traits such as boldness, dominance, egocentricity impulsivity and general psychopathic scores (Anderl et al, 2016). There are other facial variables that have yielded significant results such as the inclination of the forehead and impulsivity (Guerrero et al, 2016;Guerrero-Apolo et al, 2018a) and the volume of gray matter in certain areas of the cortex (Guerrero-Apolo et al, 2018b), age, testosterone and strength with the lower/full face ratio, cheekbone prominence and fWHR-lower (Hodges-Simeon et al, 2016), or the difference of widths between bizygomatic and bigonial arches with traits such as self-reliance and the ability/ impairment to express and feel emotions (Gabarre-Mir et al, 2017). This impairment to express or feel emotions could be explained by the deficit in emotional information processing hypothesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%