2020
DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0228.15052020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of smartphone-based instant messaging services in medical practice: a cross-sectional study

Abstract: In response to the article titled "Use of smartphone-based instant messaging services in medical practice: a cross-sectional study" published in your esteemed journal, which is a well thoughtout and well-written paper, I would like to raise few points regarding this study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instant messaging (IM) platforms are currently enjoying high subscriber numbers; applications such as WhatsApp and other IM services have become common methods of communication between dentists and patients as well as between health professionals. 2022 It is possible to transmit high-quality clinical images by email or via these IM platforms. Regarding the impact on the photo between emailing and file sharing platforms, the quality of the photo may be worse from IM.…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instant messaging (IM) platforms are currently enjoying high subscriber numbers; applications such as WhatsApp and other IM services have become common methods of communication between dentists and patients as well as between health professionals. 2022 It is possible to transmit high-quality clinical images by email or via these IM platforms. Regarding the impact on the photo between emailing and file sharing platforms, the quality of the photo may be worse from IM.…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We must strive to develop a teleservice in which its main focus is not only to reduce investment in health, but to increase the effectiveness of patient follow-up. 4…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%