2019
DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0244230119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors and relationship between screening periodicity and risk of cervical cancer among nurses and midwives. A cross-sectional study

Abstract: BACKGROUND: If nurses and midwives undergo cervical cancer screening regularly, they can become role models for other women regarding this screening. OBJECTIVES: The aims here were (i) to determine factors associated with undergoing cervical cancer screening; and (ii) to examine the association of cervical cancer screening periodicity with cervical cancer risk levels among nurses and midwives. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study in a public hospital. METHODS: 466 nurses and midwives participated in this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in line with a study from Turkey and Peru in 2018 where the frequency of undergoing Pap smear testing at least once in a lifetime was 1 times higher among multiparous women than nulliparous women. 28,37 Likewise, the current finding is comparable with the study finding from Dares Salaam, Tanzania, 12 and Tigray region 2019 and Dabat District 2020 38 where multiparous women were 3 times more likely to utilize the service than the nulliparous women. 39 The probable explanation for the similarity might be since previous pregnancies of a woman may expose her to receive health education many times compared to those with no previous pregnancies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This finding is in line with a study from Turkey and Peru in 2018 where the frequency of undergoing Pap smear testing at least once in a lifetime was 1 times higher among multiparous women than nulliparous women. 28,37 Likewise, the current finding is comparable with the study finding from Dares Salaam, Tanzania, 12 and Tigray region 2019 and Dabat District 2020 38 where multiparous women were 3 times more likely to utilize the service than the nulliparous women. 39 The probable explanation for the similarity might be since previous pregnancies of a woman may expose her to receive health education many times compared to those with no previous pregnancies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Most of the female health workers in our study had been previously screened for cervical cancer. Other studies have documented a much lower uptake of cervical cancer screening by female health workers than in our study and those ranged from 6 to 41% [8,13,53,54,56,57,[61][62][63][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73]. Female health workers who were not screened for cervical cancer cited various reasons for not attending screening including lack of access to screening services, misbeliefs about cervical cancer and screening, fear of the results and nonchalant attitude towards screening for cervical cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Female health workers who were not screened for cervical cancer cited various reasons for not attending screening including lack of access to screening services, misbeliefs about cervical cancer and screening, fear of the results and nonchalant attitude towards screening for cervical cancer. Previous studies have reported similar observations about female health workers' lack of undertaking cervical cancer screening [8,57,58,62,63,68,69,[71][72][73][74].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%