2017
DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2016.0165050916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of aspirin for migraine prophylaxis: a systematic review

Abstract: CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Many researchers have suggested that aspirin prevents migraines. However, the evidence is unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze the available evidence on the effect of aspirin as a migraine prophylactic. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review, conducted at the Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Brazil, and at the University of São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS:We performed electronic searches in the databases of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, WEB OF SCIENCE, the World Health Organizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not recommended for migraine prophylaxis in current headache guidelines, 173 antiplatelet medications (aspirin and thienopyridines, clopidogrel, and ticagrelor) have been studied in persons with migraine, including in those with PFO or who are status post closure procedures (Table 3). 174‐181 Given the paucity of randomized controlled trials (RCT) and the inconsistency of results, additional research, especially in persons with MWA and PFO, is indicated. The 3 RCT of percutaneous PFO closure in persons with migraine (MIST, 182 PRIMA, 183 and PREMIUM 184 ) failed to meet their primary endpoints, which differed between the trials (Table 4).…”
Section: Mechanistic Implications Of Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not recommended for migraine prophylaxis in current headache guidelines, 173 antiplatelet medications (aspirin and thienopyridines, clopidogrel, and ticagrelor) have been studied in persons with migraine, including in those with PFO or who are status post closure procedures (Table 3). 174‐181 Given the paucity of randomized controlled trials (RCT) and the inconsistency of results, additional research, especially in persons with MWA and PFO, is indicated. The 3 RCT of percutaneous PFO closure in persons with migraine (MIST, 182 PRIMA, 183 and PREMIUM 184 ) failed to meet their primary endpoints, which differed between the trials (Table 4).…”
Section: Mechanistic Implications Of Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment aspects in patients with CIS and MA deserve a comment. Aspirin seems a reasonable first‐line option for antithrombotic medication in secondary prevention after CIS, as evidence from randomized controlled trials suggests aspirin can reduce the frequency of migraine attacks 41 . However, optimal dosage is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviews on the relationship between migraine and CVD are scarce because of the limited number of studies available, which are mostly case‐control studies or competing studies using data from the same underlying cohort . Moreover, different methods were employed to diagnose migraine in different studies with no differentiation between aura status and striking differences in follow‐up duration .…”
Section: Clinical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, different methods were employed to diagnose migraine in different studies with no differentiation between aura status and striking differences in follow‐up duration . In addition, some studies did not control important confounders or combined outcomes such as “TIA and stroke.” Hence, several meta‐analyses had moderate to high methodological heterogeneity, and the inferences were restricted because of the limitations of the studies included …”
Section: Clinical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation