Self-administered versus interview-based questionnaires among patients with intermittent claudication: Do they give different results? A cross-sectional study

Lozano, Francisco; Lobos, José María; March, José Ramón; Carrasco, Eduardo; Barros, Marcello Barbosa; González‐Porras, José Ramón

doi:10.1590/1516-3180.2015.01733009

Cited by 13 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 29 publications

(23 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Second, the study used convenient and snowball sampling to recruit participants, and thus the results may not be generalizable to all students of healthcare and non-healthcare sectors. Third, an online self-administered questionnaire form was used instead of a face-to-face interview, with potential bias in reporting; however, studies in the health field have shown that there may not be a difference between a self-administered and interviewer-administered questionnaire ( 43 , 44 ). The reasons for the refusal or low willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccines need further investigation, possibly using qualitative or mixed methods approaches.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Influencing COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions Among College Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in India

Jain

Vij

Satapathy

et al. 2021

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Students act as messengers in delivering effective messages for better uptake of health-promoting behavior. Understanding their knowledge about coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), intentions to use the COVID-19 vaccine, and its associated factors will help develop promising strategies in vaccine promotion concerning the current COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was carried out among students in the healthcare and non-healthcare sectors to assess their intentions to get vaccinated against the COVID-19. A non-probability snowball sampling technique was used to recruit study participants (N = 655) through social media platforms and emails. Study participants were recruited across the country, including six major geographical regions (Eastern, Western, Northern, Southern, North-east, and Central) in India between November 2020 and January 2021 before the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine. Descriptive statistics were used to present the sociodemographic, and vaccine-related behaviors of the study participants. Key determinants that likely predict vaccine acceptance among students were modeled using logistic regression analysis. For each analysis, p < 0.05 was considered significant.Results: A total of 655 students were recruited, 323 from healthcare and 332 from non-healthcare sectors, to assess their intentions to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Of the 655 students, 63.8% expressed intentions to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. The acceptance was higher among non-healthcare students (54.07 vs. 45.93%). At the time of the study, 27.8% of the students indicated that they had been exposed to a confirmed COVID-19 patient. A vast majority (93.4%) of the students knew about the COVID-19 virus, and most (89.3%) of them were aware of the development of a COVID-19 vaccine. The history of vaccine hesitancy was found to be low (17.1%). Only one-third (33.4%) of the students showed concern about contracting COVID-19. Trust in the healthcare system [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 4.13; (95% CI: 2.83–6.04), p < 0.00] and trust in domestic vaccines [aOR: 1.46; (95% CI: 1.02–2.08), p < 0.05] emerged as the significant predictors of student's intention to get vaccinated. Higher acceptance for vaccine was observed among students in the non-healthcare [aOR: 1.982; 95% CI: 1.334–2.946, p < 0.00].Conclusion: This study shows that the Indian college students had relatively high levels of positive intentions to receive COVID-19 vaccines, although about one-third were not sure or unwilling to receive the vaccine, highlighting possible vaccine hesitancy. Informational campaigns and other strategies to address vaccine hesitancy are needed to promote uptake of COVID-19 vaccines.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Influencing COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions Among College Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in India

Jain

Vij

Satapathy

et al. 2021

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Self-administered instruments are cost-effective and efficient, but may bring about respondent bias, whereas interviewer-administered instruments, while able to ensure high response rates, are always resource-intensive and expensive to administer. 73 Although the literature showed that there was no significant difference in scores outcome between these two administration modes, 74 75 the relevant studies mostly concerned health-related quality of life instruments. It is still unknown whether the same is true for health literacy instruments.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of health literacy instruments used in children and adolescents: a systematic review

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveImproving health literacy at an early age is crucial to personal health and development. Although health literacy in children and adolescents has gained momentum in the past decade, it remains an under-researched area, particularly health literacy measurement. This study aimed to examine the quality of health literacy instruments used in children and adolescents and to identify the best instrument for field use.DesignSystematic review.SettingA wide range of settings including schools, clinics and communities.ParticipantsChildren and/or adolescents aged 6–24 years.Primary and secondary outcome measuresMeasurement properties (reliability, validity and responsiveness) and other important characteristics (eg, health topics, components or scoring systems) of health literacy instruments.ResultsThere were 29 health literacy instruments identified from the screening process. When measuring health literacy in children and adolescents, researchers mainly focus on the functional domain (basic skills in reading and writing) and consider participant characteristics of developmental change (of cognitive ability), dependency (on parents) and demographic patterns (eg, racial/ethnic backgrounds), less on differential epidemiology (of health and illness). The methodological quality of included studies as assessed via measurement properties varied from poor to excellent. More than half (62.9%) of measurement properties were unknown, due to either poor methodological quality of included studies or a lack of reporting or assessment. The 8-item Health Literacy Assessment Tool (HLAT-8) showed best evidence on construct validity, and the Health Literacy Measure for Adolescents showed best evidence on reliability.ConclusionsMore rigorous and high-quality studies are needed to fill the knowledge gap in measurement properties of health literacy instruments. Although it is challenging to draw a robust conclusion about which instrument is the most reliable and the most valid, this review provides important evidence that supports the use of the HLAT-8 to measure childhood and adolescent health literacy in future school-based research.

show abstract

“…The questionnaire was pre-tested on 15 respondents and adjustments were made to the unclear items accordingly (Hilton, 2017). The questionnaires were completed with the face-to-face assistance of the interviewer and reckon that this approach this improves the quality of the information collected (Lozano et al, 2016). Following Leahy (2004), the data was recorded on a spreadsheet and later analysed through the use of Microsoft Excel function for plotting graphs.…”

Section: Competitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Local economic development and small business failure: the case of a local municipality in South Africa

Mukwarami

Tengeh

2020

IJBG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite concerted efforts to nurture SMMEs through a number of methods, including LED initiatives, a high failure rate persists in South Africa. As the quest for a sustainable solution continues, this paper investigates the challenges that SMMEs face in the context of the Bushbuckridge Local Municipality (BLM). The quantitative approach was adopted for data collection. Through the use of a survey questionnaire, data were collected from a sample of fifty owners/managers who were reached through the stratified sampling technique. The study singled out lack of financial assistance, managerial skills, inaccessible global markets as the most dominant challenges to the development of SMMEs apart a from high crime rate and the fear of xenophobia. Lack of technology and insufficient government support received far lesser approval from participants as these were perceived to have less impact on SMMEs growth. This paper draws attention to the ineffectiveness of LED programmes at the grassroots level with specific reference to rural municipalities.

show abstract

Self-administered versus interview-based questionnaires among patients with intermittent claudication: Do they give different results? A cross-sectional study

Cited by 13 publications

References 29 publications

Factors Influencing COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions Among College Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in India

Factors Influencing COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions Among College Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in India

Quality of health literacy instruments used in children and adolescents: a systematic review

Local economic development and small business failure: the case of a local municipality in South Africa

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About