2020
DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.0471.r1.05032020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic discrepancies between emergency department admissions and hospital discharges among older adults: secondary analysis on a population-based survey

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Older adults frequently experience nonspecific clinical features. However, there is limited evidence on how often admission diagnoses for hospitalized older patients are incorrect, potentially leading to treatment delays. OBJECTIVES: To determine the consistency between hospital admission and discharge diagnoses, and identify factors associated with diagnostic discrepancies in older adults. DESIGN AND SETTING: Population-based coh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, diagnoses at final disposition are not necessarily more accurate than admission diagnoses, and the concordance between the two remains unstudied in resource-limited settings. 38 43 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, diagnoses at final disposition are not necessarily more accurate than admission diagnoses, and the concordance between the two remains unstudied in resource-limited settings. 38 43 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the primary outcome, we calculated the incidence of diagnostic errors with 95% CI. To evaluate the baseline factors and the differential diagnosis list of AI Monshin with regard to the incidence of diagnostic errors, we compared the incidence of diagnostic errors between the groups of older adults (aged ≥65 years) and non–older adults (aged <65 years) [ 37 - 40 ], the groups of males and females [ 33 ], the groups seen by staff and seen by residents [ 26 ], and the groups in which AI Monshin generated or did not generate the final diagnosis in the differential diagnosis list [ 26 ]; these comparisons were made using the Fisher exact test. We also calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI for the incidence of diagnostic errors in these groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was used by Kijima et al (2018) to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of acutely ill elderly patients seen at a primary care center and then admitted to an emergency department within four days 14 . In a study conducted in Brazil to determine diagnostic discrepancies between admission and discharge diagnosis, Avelino-Silva and Steinman (2020) stated that, while not all of the discrepancies were due to error, a large proportion of them were 18 . Similarly, a Japanese study investigated site of infection misdiagnosis by comparing discrepancies between the initial site of infection and that assigned in the final diagnosis 15 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies that investigated diagnostic error based on the difference between admission and discharge informed the choice of this definition [14][15][16][17][18] . Hautz et al (2016) investigated diagnostic discrepancy between emergency and admission departments, hypothesizing that the discrepancy was an indicator of diagnostic error 16 .…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%