2021
DOI: 10.1590/1414-431x202010010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the effect of rTMS on PSD, a recent meta-analysis showed that rTMS was considerably more effective than the control condition, with a SMD of −1.15 (95% CI: −1.62 to −0.69) 19. The result was corresponding to our result.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Regarding the effect of rTMS on PSD, a recent meta-analysis showed that rTMS was considerably more effective than the control condition, with a SMD of −1.15 (95% CI: −1.62 to −0.69) 19. The result was corresponding to our result.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…82 Other approaches such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, vagal nerve stimulation, magnetic seizure therapy, transcranial direct current stimulation, and deep brain stimulation have been explored, 83 but supportive evidence for their use remains scarce and inconclusive. 66 A separate review on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation 84 (7 RCTs, 351 participants) suggested that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation decreases the severity of PSD (SMD, −1.15 [95% CI, −1.02 to −0.32]) and increases the odds of remission of symptoms (odds ratio, 3.46 [95% CI, 1.68–7.12]), but statistical and clinical heterogeneity was apparent. A small, sham-controlled RCT of transcranial direct current stimulation in 48 antidepressant-free patients with PSD showed benefit with active treatment (mean difference on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 4.7; SD, 9.21; P <0.001), 85 but these results were not replicated in a similar trial focusing on poststroke motor recovery.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the combination of NIBS and antidepressants might have a better effect on PSD and could improve the depression scale score and quality of life compared with antidepressants alone. It is well known that guidelines recommend rTMS for the treatment of major depression, and many meta-analyses have shown that TMS intervention with PSD was positive ( Shen et al, 2017 ; Liu et al, 2019 ; Shao et al, 2021 ), but a growing number of studies have recommended multi-module combination therapy and population-specific personalized treatment ( Wang et al, 2019 ; Nestor and Blumberger, 2020 ), which warrants further research on the frequency and site of TMS intervention. The use of low-frequency TMS by Daniel R Schaffer significantly improved depression with cognitive impairment, suggesting that low-frequency TMS is more effective in specific populations ( Schaffer et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%