2020
DOI: 10.1590/1414-431x20198962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manual and semiautomatic segmentation of bone sarcomas on MRI have high similarity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the marrow is hyperintense, the threshold applied to the high b -value images allows a cleaner separation from other tissues, and thus requires less manual editing. This makes semi-automatic segmentation of bone marrow particularly suitable for women, while additional post-processing would be required in men to achieve matching levels of segmentation similarity [ 38 ]. Shimming technique had a small but significant effect on DSC values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the marrow is hyperintense, the threshold applied to the high b -value images allows a cleaner separation from other tissues, and thus requires less manual editing. This makes semi-automatic segmentation of bone marrow particularly suitable for women, while additional post-processing would be required in men to achieve matching levels of segmentation similarity [ 38 ]. Shimming technique had a small but significant effect on DSC values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Egger et al ( 19 , 20 ) demonstrated that semiautomatic segmentation would be faster than manual segmentation in glioblastomas and pituitary adenomas, which are tumors of the central nervous system. Dioní sio et al ( 23 ) described the time-saving advantage of the semiautomatic method over the manual method for the segmentation of bone sarcomas on MRI. We assume that our results did not reproduce those of studies of brain tumors and bone sarcomas, given the considerably greater tissue heterogeneity of the soft-tissue sarcomas included in our study sample; in the present study, semiautomatic segmentation methods tended to necessitate greater manual correction of the results of semiautomatic segmentation obtained by the software, as discussed in a previous study ( 32 ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of those radiologists (designated radiologist 1 and radiologist 2, respectively) were fellows in musculoskeletal radiology, and the third (designated radiologist 3) had five years of experience in the field. Manual segmentation was performed by manually delineating the tumor borders in each sectional slice, in all sectional slices in which tumor tissue was present ( Figure 2 ), according to procedures followed in previous studies ( 13 , 19 - 23 ) . Radiologist 1 manually segmented all cases again after a one-month interval, which allowed us to assess intraobserver variability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean interobserver DSC between Observer-1 and Observer-2 was 0.93 ± 0.04 (maximum: 0.99; minimum: 0.78). The manual approach to segmentation is still considered equal or more reliable in comparison to the automated segmentation 14 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%