2016
DOI: 10.1590/1414-431x20165149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors for the symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux

Abstract: The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for reflux disease in adult patients with laryngopharyngeal symptoms. A comprehensive search of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Ovid EBM Reviews, and PubMed was performed for English-language literature about laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), in September 2014. The papers were filtered using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eight papers were identified and included i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…20 21 A recent meta-analysis that included eight randomized and placebo controlled clinical trials has suggested no overall improvement of LPR with PPI therapy compared with placebo. 22 In our study, GERD patients with LPR symptoms have lower proportion of erosive esophagitis than those without LPR symptoms. It may support the notion that poorer response to acid suppression in GERD patients with LPR, 9 because efficacy in PPI therapy on symptom resolution is higher in patients with erosive esophagitis than those with non-erosive reflux disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 21 A recent meta-analysis that included eight randomized and placebo controlled clinical trials has suggested no overall improvement of LPR with PPI therapy compared with placebo. 22 In our study, GERD patients with LPR symptoms have lower proportion of erosive esophagitis than those without LPR symptoms. It may support the notion that poorer response to acid suppression in GERD patients with LPR, 9 because efficacy in PPI therapy on symptom resolution is higher in patients with erosive esophagitis than those with non-erosive reflux disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…There was no evidence of a therapeutic benefit with PPI therapy for 16 weeks compared with placebo . A recent meta‐analysis that included eight randomized and placebo controlled clinical trials has suggested no overall improvement of LPR with PPI therapy compared with placebo …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Three subsequent meta-analyses of controlled studies in LPR have suggested no benefit to PPI therapy overall; however, there was evidence that a subgroup of patients may benefit from such therapy. 9,88,89 Similar to patients with asthma and LPR, those with chronic cough are often treated with PPI therapy based on earlier studies suggesting that GERD is the third most common cause of chronic cough. 90,91 The recommendation of empiric therapy for reflux-related cough is solely based on open-label trials because placebo-controlled studies do not support a benefit to PPI therapy in this group.…”
Section: Medical Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Стандартным методом консервативной терапии при лечении ЛФР является применение ИПП [4,6,40]. Метаанализ, обобщивший результаты 8 исследований (370 пациентов), продемонстрировал, что ИПП эффективнее плацебо в купировании симптоматики ЛФР (ОШ 1,22; 95% ДИ 0,93-1,58) [41]. В другом метаанализе 13 рандомизированных контролируемых исследований (831 пациент) было показано, что применение ИПП приводит к более выраженному регрессу клинических проявлений ЛФР по данным опросника RSI в сравнении с плацебо (стандартизированная разница средних = 3,65; 95% ДИ 1,56-5,75) [42].…”
Section: лечениеunclassified