2021
DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232021267.07162021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of tooth loss and associated factors in institutionalized adolescents: a cross-sectional study

Abstract: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of tooth loss and associated factors in institutionalized adolescents. This cross-sectional study included 68 male adolescents incarcerated from Socio-Educational Assistance Center (CASE) aged between 15 and 19 years. Questionnaires were applied individually to assess sociodemographical, economical, medical, behavioral and oral health self-perception variables. All present teeth were evaluated by Decay, Missing, Filling (DMF) Index. The prevalence of tooth loss was ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Brazil, the prevalence of tooth loss in adolescence ranges from 12.7% to 47.06% (Casarin et al, 2021; Colussi et al, 2017; Da Cunha et al, 2017; Peres et al, 2013; Santos et al, 2020). The study of factors associated with this problem in adolescents 15–19 years of age is important, as this population is exposed to risk factors for oral problems and dental services may not meet their specific expectations and needs (Cabudol et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, the prevalence of tooth loss in adolescence ranges from 12.7% to 47.06% (Casarin et al, 2021; Colussi et al, 2017; Da Cunha et al, 2017; Peres et al, 2013; Santos et al, 2020). The study of factors associated with this problem in adolescents 15–19 years of age is important, as this population is exposed to risk factors for oral problems and dental services may not meet their specific expectations and needs (Cabudol et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%