2019
DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232018245.16032017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential and clinical relevant drug-drug interactions among elderly from nursing homes: a multicentre study in Murcia, Spain

Abstract: This study purposes to determine the prevalence of potential and clinical relevant Drug-Drug-Interactions (pDDIs) in institutionalized older adults and to identify the pertinent factors associated. We conduct an observational, multicenter and cross-sectional study during the last quarter of 2010. We selected a sample of 275 subjects (aged ≥ 65 years) from 10 nursing homes of Murcia (Spain) by a two-stage complex sampling. pDDIs were identified using the College of Pharmacists Database. We only considered pDDIs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As described previously, the frequency of severe/moderate DDIs was 24.7%. Reported frequencies of DDIs vary between 15 and 70% [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]; 55.4% of our participants were exposed to one or more severe/moderate DDIs, which is higher than the values provided from NHs by other authors (25.5% [ 11 ] and 37.8% [ 40 ]). As in other studies, a strong association between an increasing number of drugs and DDIs has been observed [ 46 , 47 ], but it should be taken into account that there are discrepancies in the literature due to the different sensitivity of the tools used to detect these interactions [ 25 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As described previously, the frequency of severe/moderate DDIs was 24.7%. Reported frequencies of DDIs vary between 15 and 70% [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]; 55.4% of our participants were exposed to one or more severe/moderate DDIs, which is higher than the values provided from NHs by other authors (25.5% [ 11 ] and 37.8% [ 40 ]). As in other studies, a strong association between an increasing number of drugs and DDIs has been observed [ 46 , 47 ], but it should be taken into account that there are discrepancies in the literature due to the different sensitivity of the tools used to detect these interactions [ 25 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…This situation is more evident for nursing home (NH) residents, who are provided care and support for daily living activities as well as medical and non-medical assistance. Institutionalised residents tend to use more drugs and in larger doses, and they usually show other characteristics (poor mental health, frailty, or lower physical activity, among others) which exposes them to DDIs [ 9 , 10 , 11 ] and, in general, drug-related problems (DRP). Several studies have indicated that the use of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in the elderly is also common in NH settings: 23.7–70% of residents had at least one PIM [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ], and 25.1–37.8% experienced potential DDIs, being 72% of moderate or major severity [ 9 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polypharmacy in our cohort was significantly associated with the number of major DDIs. This was the strongest association (although it has still to be considered as weak) and has been confirmed by previous studies [37,55,60]. Evidence regarding associations between DDIs and other patient-related factors (which were missing in our cohort) is inconsistent; some research detected higher DDI prevalences in patients with older age [55], male sex [43,55] respectively multimorbidity [60].…”
Section: Polypharmacy and Associated Factorssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…25 According to the classification of the DI in terms of their monitorability, it was possible to verify that most DI were classified as monitorable (90.9%), but few were associated with a detectable clinical consequence (27%), very similar to that found by Dumbreck et al 24 These results reveal that the pharmacist could and should easily use clinical parameters to determine the existence of a DI whenever possible, since the identification of a potential DI in the pharmacotherapy does not necessarily reflect a clinical alteration. 2,26 That is, when it comes to a monitorable DI, continuous attention to the parameters of effectiveness and safety of each medication can go a longer way than the identification of all DI and their communication to the health team.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%