2016
DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232015203.23472015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Riscos e benefícios do rastreamento do câncer de mama no Brasil

Abstract: Ao longo de cinco décadas um forte consenso foi construído em torno do rastreamento mamográfico, baseado, em grande parte, na crença de que este não está associado a riscos e que apresenta benefício de grande magnitude na incidência, sobrevida e mortalidade por câncer de mama.O , considerado entre os três melhores estudos já feitos sobre o tema pela Colaboração Cochrane, o pan-canadense é um estudo observacional, que apresenta diversos problemas, como ausência de alocação aleatória da intervenção e possível in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, studies that use data from several services 14,16 may be subject to greater heterogeneity than those evaluating a single center 15 . Moreover, the different socioeconomic realities found in our country may contribute so that the screening is offered in an unequal way in different locations, influencing the rate of tumor detection 10,17 . Nevertheless, the BI-RADS 5 category presented good agreement between studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, studies that use data from several services 14,16 may be subject to greater heterogeneity than those evaluating a single center 15 . Moreover, the different socioeconomic realities found in our country may contribute so that the screening is offered in an unequal way in different locations, influencing the rate of tumor detection 10,17 . Nevertheless, the BI-RADS 5 category presented good agreement between studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information communicated to the population by governments also tends to overestimate the benefits of screening and underestimate its risks 29 . These concepts also persist in academic publications, and many physicians believe that the increased survival time in screening studies confirms the benefits of this practice 15,30,31 . In developing countries, it is common for the number and proportion of breast cancer cases in young women to be used to justify mammographic screening in women under 50 years 32 , when in fact these numbers are heavily dependent on the countries' demographic profile and do not modify the balance between risks and benefits, showing that conceptual errors have a role in disseminating this type of practice.…”
Section: Challenges and Barriers To Implementation Of The New Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 92%