2016
DOI: 10.1590/0370-44672016690147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial

Abstract: Upon finishing one more year for REM, I would like to comment on a small reflection of mine. It seems that after thirty years of heading this publication, I am still surprised to find that the job of science editor still has the same problems of previous decades, although information technology has greatly improved the demands of this function. Although the SciElo site informs the number of accesses to our publication, around a5.3 million, our impact factor is still low which prompted Thomson Reuters to remove… Show more

Help me understand this report

This publication either has no citations yet, or we are still processing them

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?

See others like this or search for similar articles