2018
DOI: 10.1590/01047760201824012484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Response Surface Methodology (Rsm) and Artificial Neural Networks (Ann) Towards Efficient Optimization of Flexural Properties of Gypsum-Bonded Fiberboards

Abstract: response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networks (ANN) towards efficient optimization of flexural properties of gypsum-bonded fiberboards. CERNE, v. 24, n. 1, p. 35-47, 2018. HIGHLIGHTS The higher non-wood extractives causes to the higher setting time of the gypsum paste, while temperature decreases. The ANN prediction model is a quite effective tool for modeling bending strength of gypsum-bonded fiberboard. Maximum MOR is achieved by increase in bagasse, kenaf and glass fibers content and rea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noticed that RSM values were lower for RMSE, MPE, MAE and SEP. This indicates that RSM model is more precise in predicting specific energy requirement for bio-fiber comminution process; although this finding is contrary to those reported elsewhere [29], it may be attributed to the finite experimental data used in network training.…”
Section: Comparison Of Response Surface Methods and Artificial Neural contrasting
confidence: 96%
“…It is noticed that RSM values were lower for RMSE, MPE, MAE and SEP. This indicates that RSM model is more precise in predicting specific energy requirement for bio-fiber comminution process; although this finding is contrary to those reported elsewhere [29], it may be attributed to the finite experimental data used in network training.…”
Section: Comparison Of Response Surface Methods and Artificial Neural contrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Table 8 shows the error comparison obtained from both and ANN predictions. The comparative error analysis was used to verify the prediction accuracy and generalization capacity of both models in optimizing the bioprocess 53 , 54 . Overall, the ANN model showed lower error values than the RSM, indicating lower computational deviations and an advanced generalization capability 11 , 54 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm (LM), known to be the fastest back-propagation algorithm, was employed. In particular, the LM shows outstanding performance in nonlinear regression problems and is well-suited for mean-squared error training neural networks [34,35]. The activation function consists of a nonlinear neural network, the sigmoid function is applied to the hidden layer, and the purlin function is applied to the output layer as a linear activation function.…”
Section: Ann Analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%