2015
DOI: 10.1590/01047760201521042006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planejamento Espacial Da Colheita Considerando Áreas Máximas Operacionais

Abstract: PLANEJAMENTO ESPACIAL DA COLHEITA CONSIDERANDO ÁREAS MÁXIMAS OPERACIONAISRESUMO: Um dos maiores desafios com que se deparam os gestores na realização do planejamento da produção florestal se refere às questões logísticas das operações de colheita. O planejamento operacional da colheita florestal deve ser realizado de forma a conciliar as questões econômicas e ambientais, buscando aumentar a eficiência e mitigar danos relacionados à abertura da cobertura florestal. A inclusão de relações espaciais no planejamen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
3
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Öhman and Eriksson (2010) obtained a 2.6% NPV reduction for achieving a 51.8% reduction in the perimeter of harvesting areas. Our results are also compatible with related adjacency problems, such as maximum harvesting area constraints (Murray and Weintraub, 2002;Zhu and Bettinger, 2007;Gomide et al, 2010;Binoti et al, 2012;Augustynczik et al, 2015). Moreover, with the aggregation of harvesting areas and increase in operational efficiency related to road maintenance and forest harvesting, a cost reduction resulting from blocking harvesting activities is expected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For example, Öhman and Eriksson (2010) obtained a 2.6% NPV reduction for achieving a 51.8% reduction in the perimeter of harvesting areas. Our results are also compatible with related adjacency problems, such as maximum harvesting area constraints (Murray and Weintraub, 2002;Zhu and Bettinger, 2007;Gomide et al, 2010;Binoti et al, 2012;Augustynczik et al, 2015). Moreover, with the aggregation of harvesting areas and increase in operational efficiency related to road maintenance and forest harvesting, a cost reduction resulting from blocking harvesting activities is expected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, considering the post-harvest fragmentation problem, different types of forest management can influence the intensity of edge effect and fire risk (Armenteras et al 2013). In this sense, the use of spatial constraints can solve a variety of problems such as the maintenance of ecological corridors to connect protected areas, adjacency, habitat protection, and large harvest areas (Augustynczik et al, 2015). Adjacency constraints have been widely used in forest harvest scheduling problems (Borges et.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As estimativas de produção futura, bem como os custos do projeto florestal e de colheita, foram obtidas por Binoti (2010). Para essas florestas foram considerados o plantio de apenas um clone híbrido (Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis).…”
Section: Estimativas De Produção E Custosunclassified
“…No caso da regulação florestal, uma das ferramentas mais utilizadas é a programação linear (LEUSCHNER et al, 1975), que utiliza o algoritmo simplex para chegar à otimização dos recursos florestais. Essa ferramenta tem sido amplamente utilizada na regulação da produção e otimização do transporte florestal (SILVA et al, 2003;MCDILL;MANNING, 2011;CARVALHO et al, 2015;AUGUSTYNCZIK et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified