2015
DOI: 10.1590/0104-9224/si2001.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operator Bias in the Estimation of Arc Efficiency in Gas Tungsten Arc Welding

Abstract: Abstract:In this paper the operator bias in the measurement process of arc efficiency in stationary direct current electrode negative gas tungsten arc welding is discussed. An experimental study involving 15 operators (enough to reach statistical significance) has been carried out with the purpose to estimate the arc efficiency from a specific procedure for calorimetric experiments. The measurement procedure consists of three manual operations which introduces operator bias in the measurement process. An addit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These errors arise from the test principle (intrinsic errors), uncontrollable variables (random errors) and measurement accuracies (instrumental). Sikström 18 used a water-cooled stationary anode calorimeter as case study to determine errors in the measurement process of arc efficiency. He focused his study on instrumental errors, operator influence (manual operations that introduce operator bias in the measurement process, such as arc length setting) and welding leads voltage drop (measuring the potential between the terminals of the welding power source instead of measuring the potential between the electrode contact tube and the workpiece).…”
Section: Source Of Inaccuracies In Water-cooled Stationary Anode Calo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These errors arise from the test principle (intrinsic errors), uncontrollable variables (random errors) and measurement accuracies (instrumental). Sikström 18 used a water-cooled stationary anode calorimeter as case study to determine errors in the measurement process of arc efficiency. He focused his study on instrumental errors, operator influence (manual operations that introduce operator bias in the measurement process, such as arc length setting) and welding leads voltage drop (measuring the potential between the terminals of the welding power source instead of measuring the potential between the electrode contact tube and the workpiece).…”
Section: Source Of Inaccuracies In Water-cooled Stationary Anode Calo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of different operators over quality related aspects of the welding process is of great significance as reported by Ji et al [17]. Sïkstrom showed the variations in terms of process efficiency during Gas Tungsten Arc welding [18]. In the field of laser processing of metals, literature is sparse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Costa et al [12] utilizan la metodología de superficie de respuesta para el modelado de funciones objetivo (variables de respuesta con variables de entrada) y la optimización se realiza con algoritmos genéticos y la gráfica de frente de Pareto, siendo posible establecer modelos matemáticos empíricos satisfactorios para las variables de respuesta. Posteriormente, los autores en [13] realizan un estudio experimental con 15 operadores en el cual se estudia el sesgo de la eficiencia del arco, dando como resultado que el sesgo primordialmente es provocado por la caída del voltaje debido al mal estado de los cables de soldadura, siendo insignificante el factor de la manipulación del operador; estos resultados se evalúan estadísticamente.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified