2015
DOI: 10.1590/0104-1169.0325.2644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A content validity study of signs, symptoms and diseases/health problems expressed in LIBRAS

Abstract: Objectives: to validate the content of signs, symptoms and diseases/health problems expressed in LIBRAS for people with deafness Method: methodological development study, which involved 36 people with deafness and three LIBRAS specialists. The study was conducted in three stages: investigation of the signs, symptoms and diseases/health problems, referred to by people with deafness, reported in a questionnaire; video recordings of how people with deafness express, through LIBRA, the signs, symptoms and diseases… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This investigation is in step with another study that aimed at validating the content of signs, symptoms and diseases/health care grievances expressed in Libras by deaf people, wherein 33 expressions were assessed and 28 of them obtained satisfactory CVI, thus being deemed representative and valid. (25) It must be emphasized that content validity is of utmost importance on tool development and adaptation processes. The reports of another study are corroborated as it implicates that the methodology in use may subsidize the development of technology that is attractive and comprehensive to the deaf public, what may facilitate the production of other technologies linked to education, focused on this theme or on any other that involves health care and attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This investigation is in step with another study that aimed at validating the content of signs, symptoms and diseases/health care grievances expressed in Libras by deaf people, wherein 33 expressions were assessed and 28 of them obtained satisfactory CVI, thus being deemed representative and valid. (25) It must be emphasized that content validity is of utmost importance on tool development and adaptation processes. The reports of another study are corroborated as it implicates that the methodology in use may subsidize the development of technology that is attractive and comprehensive to the deaf public, what may facilitate the production of other technologies linked to education, focused on this theme or on any other that involves health care and attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and its items. Items marked with "Agree" or "Strongly Agree" are considered representative, obtaining an index score of 1.00 and the item that has all assessments equal to 1.00 will have 100% agreement (26) .…”
Section: Instruments Used To Collect Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assim, o IVC mede a proporção ou porcentagem de juízes que concordam sobre determinados aspectos do instrumento e seus itens. Consideram-se como representativos os itens marcados com "Concordo" ou "Concordo totalmente", obtendo escore do índice igual a 1,00 e o item que tiver todas as avaliações igual a 1,00 terá 100% de concordância (26) .…”
Section: Tratamento E Análise Dos Dadosunclassified