2021
DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20190294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The water footprint of beef cattle in the amazon region, Brazil

Abstract: Food production and water scarcity, both in constant growth and intrinsically linked, are subjects of great relevance in current studies in several areas of knowledge. The impacts generated by the production of beef are at the center of major environmental debates, especially the consumption of water for the production and development of the livestock production chain. This research analyzed the use of water resources in the production of beef in the Amazon biome. The water footprint for beef cattle was of 13,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like Junior and Dziedzic [19] and Palhares et al [9], most of the existing literature reports the WF in terms of beef cattle on either per kilogram of a live animal or per kilogram of a carcass. Only some studies, like Chapagain and Hoekstra [10] and Mekonnen and Hoekstra [11], broke it down into products (carcass, beef bone-in, and boneless beef) and by-products (offal, leather, and semen).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like Junior and Dziedzic [19] and Palhares et al [9], most of the existing literature reports the WF in terms of beef cattle on either per kilogram of a live animal or per kilogram of a carcass. Only some studies, like Chapagain and Hoekstra [10] and Mekonnen and Hoekstra [11], broke it down into products (carcass, beef bone-in, and boneless beef) and by-products (offal, leather, and semen).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that very little information exists on the contribution of the various links in the value chain to the WF of beef. More recent studies that focused on the WFs of livestock in beef production, beef cattle, and livestock products also did not break the WF down to product level or ignored the contribution of processing to the total WF [17][18][19][20]. Palhares et al [9] did indicate that the grey WF of the beef processing plant was included based on the total phosphorus concentration in the effluent but failed to report the findings of the processing WF separately in the article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%