2015
DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20131470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DelPapa - Aplicativo computacional para a análise de dados de experimentos no delineamento blocos ao acaso, usando o método Papadakis

Abstract: RESUMOO aplicativo computacional para a análise de

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genes (CRUZ, 2013) software was used in these analyzes. The same trials were also analyzed using the randomized complete block design (RCBD) and spatial analysis or Papadakis method, using DelPapa (STORCK et al, 2015) software. From these analyzes, precision measurements were obtained as follows: relative efficiency for the use of complete block in relation to completely randomized design (CRD); relative efficiency of the use of triple lattice in relation to RCBD; error variation coefficient (VCe); genetic variation coefficient (VCg); ratio VCe/ VCg; and selective accuracy (SA), which was estimated as: SA = (1-1/F) 1/2 , for F>1, and SA = 0, for F<1, in which F is the F test value for the genotype.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Genes (CRUZ, 2013) software was used in these analyzes. The same trials were also analyzed using the randomized complete block design (RCBD) and spatial analysis or Papadakis method, using DelPapa (STORCK et al, 2015) software. From these analyzes, precision measurements were obtained as follows: relative efficiency for the use of complete block in relation to completely randomized design (CRD); relative efficiency of the use of triple lattice in relation to RCBD; error variation coefficient (VCe); genetic variation coefficient (VCg); ratio VCe/ VCg; and selective accuracy (SA), which was estimated as: SA = (1-1/F) 1/2 , for F>1, and SA = 0, for F<1, in which F is the F test value for the genotype.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding error estimates, homogeneity between genotype variances was verified using the Bartlett test (STEEL et al, 1997) with α=0.05. Normality of distribution and error randomness was assessed by the Shapiro-Wilk test (α=0.05) (STORCK et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%