Open innovation integration to product development: a sector level analysis within the manufacturing industry

Marin, Rafael Ortega; Kaminski, Paulo Carlos

doi:10.1590/0103-6513.20200012

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 28 publications

(23 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The questionnaire was developed based on consolidated constructs in the literature. The constructs were: I4.0 (Chakrabarti, 2023), LM (Sony, 2018), PDP (Marin and Kaminski, 2020), and MP (Maqueira et al, 2021). The "I4.0 principles" was subdivided based on previous literature on I4.0 readiness and maturity models (Lichtblau et al, 2015;Schumacher et al, 2016;Schuh et al, 2020;Mittal et al, 2018;Santos and Martinho, 2020;Elibal and € Ozceylan, 2022).…”

Section: Survey Instrumentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The link between lean manufacturing and Industry 4.0 for product development process: a systemic approach

Tardio,

Schaefer,

Nara

et al. 2023

JMTM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This research examines the impact of integrating lean manufacturing (LM) principles and Industry 4.0 (I4.0) into the product development process (PDP) of manufacturing companies in southern Brazil, with the objective of improving market performance (MP).Design/methodology/approachA survey was conducted with 110 product development managers to evaluate the level of LM and I4.0 principles, PDP phases, and the improvement of MP. Quantitative analysis was employed to analyse the data, including confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and ordinary least squares (OLS) hierarchical regression.FindingsThe study reveals that integrating LM and I4.0 principles in the PDP enhances product development and positively impacts the MP of manufacturing companies. Additionally, I4.0 partially mediates the LM-PDP relationship, while LM partially mediates the I4.0-PDP relationship, highlighting their interdependence rather than one being a prerequisite for the other.Research limitations/implicationsThe study has limitations regarding its narrow focus on product development managers in Brazil and the absence of multiple case studies.Practical implicationsThe study emphasises the importance of coordinated efforts in manufacturing companies to adopt and manage both LM and I4.0 principles, as they positively impact all phases of the PDP and ultimately contribute to the overall MP of the companies.Originality/valueThe novelty of this study lies in its systemic approach, examining the relationships and effects of LM and I4.0 principles on the PDP, and demonstrating how these effects manifest in manufacturing companies.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Survey Instrumentmentioning

confidence: 99%

The link between lean manufacturing and Industry 4.0 for product development process: a systemic approach

Tardio,

Schaefer,

Nara

et al. 2023

JMTM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the manufacturing industry, recent studies suggest more frequency of inbound practices and strong supplier role in product design. An organisational culture that favours Open Innovation and the implementation of new PDP practices could drive more openness into design [102]. Based on their demands, high-tech firms in developing countries choose implement OI into NPD at several stages with many partners.…”

Section: Comparative Analysis and Open Innovation Contribution For Np...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Lean and Green Product Development in SMEs: A Comparative Study between Small- and Medium-Sized Brazilian and Japanese Enterprises

Oliveira

Piovesan

Setti

et al. 2022

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Facing the new challenges in production processes, companies should adopt lean and green practices in product development. In SMEs, the application of these practices is more complex. This work explores the maturity of lean–green methodologies in the product development process in Brazilian and Japanese SMEs. The methodology used is multicriteria, combining the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and TOPSIS 2-tuple method, applied to four Japanese SMEs and four Brazilian SMEs in the metalworking sector. The criteria for evaluating SMEs are company flexibility, difficulties with NPD, innovation, limited resources, and personnel authority high. The TOPSIS method alternatives refer to 18 lean–green enablers. In the AHP method, the prioritisation of criteria between Japanese and Brazilian specialists presented divergences. In the Japanese context, the incidence of innovation is predominant, while in the Brazilian context, the most important is the limited resources. In the TOPSIS 2-tuple method, the results showed a higher level of maturity in lean–green methodologies in Japanese companies than in Brazilian ones. Lean practices are more evolved compared to sustainable practices in both countries. The study also addressed how open innovation adoption may contribute to innovation and NPD practices. Policymakers need to understand the heterogeneity of innovators within SMEs and how they differently innovate, developing distinct internal and external activities.

show abstract

Caracterización y comparación de metodologías ágiles y tradicionales de desarrollo de producto

Monroy¹,

Padua²,

Jiménez³

2022

Cien.Ing.Neogranadina

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

En 1968 se formalizó la primera metodología de desarrollo de producto y actualmente se encuentran en la literatura más de 45 que integran en sus etapas factores que permiten crear con éxito un producto, bien sea tangible o intangible. A lo largo de los años las metodologías han incorporado diversidad de factores en sus etapas para crear con éxito un producto. Pese a esto, no se ha encontrado en la literatura una investigación que integre los factores más relevantes, que permitan hacer una comparación de metodologías de desarrollo. El presente artículo contempla dos objetivos: el primero, identificar los factores principales mediante la ejecución de un análisis cualitativo de contenido, con el fin de utilizarlos para la elaboración de una matriz de comparación de metodologías de desarrollo, y el segundo, elaborar dos cuadros de ponderación en los cuales se expondrá la frecuencia de los factores en metodologías ágiles o tradicionales y la frecuencia de los factores más relevantes en el sector tecnológico. Se espera que los resultados obtenidos aporten a futuros investigadores un punto de partida que les permita entender de una forma sencilla los principales factores de las metodologías para su eventual selección, incluyendo los más representativos para el sector tecnológico, además de servir como insumo para la creación de metodologías ágiles o tradicionales enfocadas al desarrollo de producto.

show abstract

Open innovation integration to product development: a sector level analysis within the manufacturing industry

Cited by 3 publications

References 28 publications

The link between lean manufacturing and Industry 4.0 for product development process: a systemic approach

The link between lean manufacturing and Industry 4.0 for product development process: a systemic approach

Lean and Green Product Development in SMEs: A Comparative Study between Small- and Medium-Sized Brazilian and Japanese Enterprises

Caracterización y comparación de metodologías ágiles y tradicionales de desarrollo de producto

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About