2022
DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440202203562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcutaneous tissue reaction and gene expression of inflammatory markers after Biodentine and MTA implantation

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the subcutaneous connective tissue response of isogenic mice exposed to tricalcium silicate (Biodentine) and aggregated mineral trioxide (ProRoot MTA). A total of 120 mice were divided into 4 groups in 3 different experimental periods (7, 21 and 63 days): Biodentine; Pro-Root MTA; zinc oxide-eugenol and; Negative control - Sham. After the experimental periods microscopic descriptive, semi-quantitative and quantitative analysis of the inflammatory process were analyzed on H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contradictorily, whereas studies revealed that Biodentine promoted higher viability and cellular differentiation and mineralization potential (Ali et al, 2019; Rathinam et al, 2021), other studies showed that ProRoot MTA prompted higher osteogenic/odontogenic gene expression and higher mineralization (Kim et al, 2021; Santiago et al, 2021). In vivo , two studies revealed that Biodentine is associated with higher early immunoreactivity (da Fonseca et al, 2019) and gene expression (Silva et al, 2022) of proinflammatory cytokines (IL‐6 and TNF‐α) as compared to MTA. Collectively, these variations in the biological responses may at least be partly due to variable effects of the two materials on the interactions between different cell types, such as cells from inflammatory and stromal lineages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contradictorily, whereas studies revealed that Biodentine promoted higher viability and cellular differentiation and mineralization potential (Ali et al, 2019; Rathinam et al, 2021), other studies showed that ProRoot MTA prompted higher osteogenic/odontogenic gene expression and higher mineralization (Kim et al, 2021; Santiago et al, 2021). In vivo , two studies revealed that Biodentine is associated with higher early immunoreactivity (da Fonseca et al, 2019) and gene expression (Silva et al, 2022) of proinflammatory cytokines (IL‐6 and TNF‐α) as compared to MTA. Collectively, these variations in the biological responses may at least be partly due to variable effects of the two materials on the interactions between different cell types, such as cells from inflammatory and stromal lineages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%