2018
DOI: 10.1590/0102.3772e3456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propriedades Psicométricas da Versão Brasileira da Escala de Satisfação das Necessidades Básicas no Esporte (BNSSS)

Abstract: Resumo Este estudo investigou as propriedades psicométricas da versão brasileira da Basic Needs Satisfaction in Sport Scale (BNSSS). O instrumento foi traduzido e adaptado por três especialistas da área. Um total de 475 atletas participaram deste estudo: 395 em um estudo de validade e 80 em um estudo de estabilidade temporal. Os resultados demonstraram traduções claras e pertinentes entre os três especialistas, e consistência interna satisfatória dos itens em português. Diferentes modelos foram testados (AFE e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the Brazilian version of the Basic Needs Satisfaction in Sport Scale (Nascimento Junior et al, 2018), originally developed by Ng et al (2011), to investigate the satisfaction of basic psychological needs of coaches and athletes. Differently from the original scale (which has five dimensions: competence, choice, internal perceived locus of causality, volition, and relatedness), the Brazilian scale is constituted of only one general dimension of autonomy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used the Brazilian version of the Basic Needs Satisfaction in Sport Scale (Nascimento Junior et al, 2018), originally developed by Ng et al (2011), to investigate the satisfaction of basic psychological needs of coaches and athletes. Differently from the original scale (which has five dimensions: competence, choice, internal perceived locus of causality, volition, and relatedness), the Brazilian scale is constituted of only one general dimension of autonomy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the EFA, the authors tested different models in order to find the best fit since the content analysis revealed inconsistencies. Thus, the instrument is composed of 12 items distributed in three dimensions: competence (item 6 “I feel that I am good at my sport”), autonomy (item 1 “In my sport, I fell that I am pursuing my personal goals”) and relatedness (item 4 “There are people in my sport who care about me”), which is available for reader consultation (Nascimento Junior et al, 2018). Answers are given in a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1– “Not true at all” to 7– “Very true.” Scale Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) presented acceptable fit for athletes [ X 2 (51) = 82.137; p = 0.004; X 2 / df = 1.611; CFI = 0.94; GFI = 0.93; TLI = 0.93; RMSEA = 0.06; P (rmsea < 0.05) = 0.268].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34,35 The Brazilian version of the Basic Needs Satisfaction in Sport Scale (BNSSS) was used. 36 The Brazilian scale consists of 12 items divided into three subscales: competence (e.g. "I am skilled in my sport"), autonomy (e.g.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Basic Needs Satisfaction Sport Scale (BNSSS): The BNSSS [26,27] consists of 12 items, four tapping competence need satisfaction (e.g., "I have the ability to perform well in my sport"), four satisfaction of the need for autonomy (e.g., "In my sport, I can take part in the decision-making process"), and four assessing relatedness need satisfaction (e.g., "In my sport, I feel close to other people"). In responding to the EDMCQ-C and BNSSS, the athletes responded to the items on 5-point Likert scales ranging from (1) strongly disagree to (5) strongly agree.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%