2021
DOI: 10.1590/0102-77863610020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of SEBAL and Ts/VI Trapezoid Models for Estimating Actual Evapotranspiration in the Algerian Semi-Arid Environment to Improve Agricultural Water Management

Abstract: Accurate spatio-temporal estimation of evapotranspiration (ET) and surface energy fluxes is crucial for many agro-environmental applications, including the determination of water balance, irrigation scheduling, agro-ecological zoning, simulation of global changes in land use and forecasting crop yields. Remote sensing based energy balance models are presently most suitable for estimating ET at both temporal and spatial scales. This study presents an intercomparison of ET maps over the Habra plain in western Al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(54 reference statements)
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Temperature errors recorded are almost identical to the values reported in previous studies with an RMSE ranging from approximately 2.8 to 4.2 K [CONSOLI, VANELLA et al 2014;FELLAH et al 2021;MADUGUNDU et al 2017;DOS SANTOS et al 2020;TIMMERMANS et al 2007;ZOU et al 2018]. Noting that for our study site, surface temperature Ts and bare soils (dry pixels) are…”
Section: Surface Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Temperature errors recorded are almost identical to the values reported in previous studies with an RMSE ranging from approximately 2.8 to 4.2 K [CONSOLI, VANELLA et al 2014;FELLAH et al 2021;MADUGUNDU et al 2017;DOS SANTOS et al 2020;TIMMERMANS et al 2007;ZOU et al 2018]. Noting that for our study site, surface temperature Ts and bare soils (dry pixels) are…”
Section: Surface Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It was noted that the two-source models are more accurate for estimating H with RMSE between 30 and 75 W•m -2 for TSEB and between 25 and 60 W•m -2 for SPARSE. Errors in the estimates are almost identical to those in previous studies [DOS SANTOS et al 2020;FELLAH et al 2021;KUSTAS, NORMAN 1999;TANG, LI 2015;TIMMERMANS et al 2007]. These results are explained by the type of formulation used in each model, thus the two-source models are more robust than the single-source models which do not take into account all resistance parameters such as stomatic resistance and which use a single surface temperature, while the two-source models use a temperature for soil T sl and vegetation T c for estimation H c and H s .…”
Section: Sensible Heat Fluxsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Firstly, the way ET is obtained differs between STEEP and the other products. While STEEP and other SEB single-source models estimate ET as a combined singular process, i.e., there is no distinction between soil evaporation and transpiration (Sahnoun et al, 2021) and interception loss is not taken into account, MOD16 and PMLv2 discriminate the components of soil evaporation, canopy transpiration, and wet canopy evaporation (Mu et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2019). With this in mind it is remarkable that STEEP performs better than the other, widely used, multiple-source ET products.…”
Section: Comparison Of Steep Model Estimates With Global Evapotranspi...mentioning
confidence: 99%