2020
DOI: 10.1590/0102-7786351032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Previsões de Precipitação de Modelos Atmosféricos como Subsídio à Operação de Sistemas de Reservatórios

Abstract: Resumo Modelos atmosféricos globais e regionais são importantes ferramentas para a gestão de recursos hídricos. Com a intenção de realizar previsão de vazões e subsidiar a operação de sistemas de abastecimento, esse estudo avaliou as previsões de precipitação de três modelos atmosféricos. Foram analisadas as previsões dos modelos ETA (resolução horizontal de 40 km, horizonte de 10 dias), BAM (resolução horizontal de 20 km, horizonte de 10 dias) e WRF (resolução horizontal de 5 km, horizonte de 3 dias) para as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the correlations found between the out ows and the conventional stream ow gauge station Q3 were signi cantly lower when compared with Q1 and Q2, particularly when considering the yearly period (r = 0.62), being a moderate correlation according to the classi cation of Bozzoni (2020).…”
Section: { }mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the correlations found between the out ows and the conventional stream ow gauge station Q3 were signi cantly lower when compared with Q1 and Q2, particularly when considering the yearly period (r = 0.62), being a moderate correlation according to the classi cation of Bozzoni (2020).…”
Section: { }mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The classi cation of the correlation between the variables was de ned based on the proposition presented by Bozzoni et al (2020), according to which the correlation is moderate for r values above 0.5, strong for values above 0.7 and very strong for values above 0.9. The test assesses the following hypotheses: H 0 -the data are independent and equally distributed (there is no trend) and H 1 -the data have a monotonic trend over time (there is a trend).…”
Section: Exploratory Analysis Of the Relationship Between Owsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KGE was firstly proposed by Gupta et al (2009) as an improvement of the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and later modified by Kling et al (2012). The coefficient has been applied to evaluate projected rainfall in Brazil, showing satisfactory results (Baez-Villanueva et al, 2018;Bozzini and Mello Junior, 2020). Eq.…”
Section: Methods Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%