2015
DOI: 10.1590/0102-33062015abb0186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pollen morphology and its taxonomic significance in the genus Bomarea Mirb. (Alstroemeriaceae) - II. Subgenus Bomarea

Abstract: Pollen morphology of 52 species (out of c. 79) of the Bomarea subgenus Bomarea was examined using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), or using SEM alone. The studied species of Bomarea were stenopalynous, characterized by large, oblate, monosulcate monads with reticulate exine sculpture in most species. Wide variation was observed in quantitative palynological features. The studied taxa were divided into four major groups based on exine ornamentation observed under SEM: microreticulate, re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Study of palyno‐anatomical features has been the fascinating and a field of scientific analysis since the most primitive microscopists. The various morphological features of pollen such as shape, symmetry, exine configuration, and apertural pattern are very conservative characters for plants taxonomic evaluation (Bera, Basumatary, & Dixit, ; Keshavarzi, Abassian, & Sheidai, ; Perveen, ; Sarwar, Hoshino, & Araki, , , ). For natural classification, the usefulness of pollen morphology is as an interpretative key and now very debated (Blackmore & Barnes, ; Ghosh & Karmakar, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study of palyno‐anatomical features has been the fascinating and a field of scientific analysis since the most primitive microscopists. The various morphological features of pollen such as shape, symmetry, exine configuration, and apertural pattern are very conservative characters for plants taxonomic evaluation (Bera, Basumatary, & Dixit, ; Keshavarzi, Abassian, & Sheidai, ; Perveen, ; Sarwar, Hoshino, & Araki, , , ). For natural classification, the usefulness of pollen morphology is as an interpretative key and now very debated (Blackmore & Barnes, ; Ghosh & Karmakar, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be used to solve the taxonomic problems of plant groups, such as identification, taxa delimitation, classification and relationship assessment (Yao and Zhang 2016;Al-Hakimi et al 2017;Tripathi et al 2017;Ruiz-Domínguez et al 2019;Chen et al 2019;de Souza et al 2019;Ragho 2020). The pollen morphological characters such as polar axis length (P), equatorial diameter (E), P/E ratio, pollen sculpture or exine ornamentation (Via do Pico and Dematteis 2013;Ferrauto and Pavone 2014;Sarwar et al 2015;Al-Hakimi et al 2018), pollen size, pollen shape, exine thickness (Akhila and Beevy 2015;Krachai and Pornpongrungrueng 2015;Noedoost et al 2021) are valuable for distinguishing and identification of many plant groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%